Re: help on webob

2011-01-10 Thread Chris McDonough
For the record, thanks to everyone who contributed tests! There were about 25 tests, and now there are somewhere in the range of 90 or so. This is great, although we obviously have a ways to go to get full coverage. WebOb 1.0.1 was recently released with the new tests and some bugfixes. -- You

Re: help on webob

2010-12-31 Thread Kyle Terry
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Mariano Mara wrote: > Excerpts from Kyle Terry's message of Fri Dec 31 15:08:12 -0300 2010: > > > On Dec 31, 2010 7:11 AM, "Mariano Mara" > wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Danny Navarro's message of Fri Dec 31 07:58:54 -0300 > 2010: > > > > > > > > Maybe you could m

Re: help on webob

2010-12-31 Thread Mariano Mara
Excerpts from Kyle Terry's message of Fri Dec 31 15:08:12 -0300 2010: > > On Dec 31, 2010 7:11 AM, "Mariano Mara" wrote: > > > Excerpts from Danny Navarro's message of Fri Dec 31 07:58:54 -0300 2010: > > > > > > Maybe you could make your webob repo writable to Kyle, Gael, Marius > > > and me so th

Re: help on webob

2010-12-31 Thread Kyle Terry
On Dec 31, 2010 7:11 AM, "Mariano Mara" wrote: > > Excerpts from Danny Navarro's message of Fri Dec 31 07:58:54 -0300 2010: > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mariano Mara wrote: > > > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 17:16:21 -0300 2010: > > >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:2

Re: help on webob

2010-12-31 Thread Mariano Mara
Excerpts from Danny Navarro's message of Fri Dec 31 07:58:54 -0300 2010: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mariano Mara wrote: > > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 17:16:21 -0300 2010: > >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:24:05PM -0300, Mariano Mara wrote: > >> > Excerpts from Mar

Re: help on webob

2010-12-31 Thread Danny Navarro
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mariano Mara wrote: > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 17:16:21 -0300 2010: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:24:05PM -0300, Mariano Mara wrote: >> > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33 -0300 2010: >> > > On Thu, Dec 30,

Re: help on webob

2010-12-31 Thread Gael Pasgrimaud
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote: (...) > > That's a bit ironic: I spent about an hour writing tests for > html_escape, without noticing your email, resulting in duplicated > effort. > I'm sorry about that. I just point out my old fork to help. Not to make the work of others

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Mariano Mara
Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 17:16:21 -0300 2010: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:24:05PM -0300, Mariano Mara wrote: > > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33 -0300 2010: > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: > > > > Is

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:24:05PM -0300, Mariano Mara wrote: > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33 -0300 2010: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: > > > Is anyone interested in leading a task to give WebOb 100% test coverage? > > > It's a

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Mariano Mara
Excerpts from Danny Navarro's message of Thu Dec 30 16:33:02 -0300 2010: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Mariano Mara wrote: > > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33 -0300 2010: > >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: > >> > I've been igno

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Ben Bangert
On Dec 30, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Gael Pasgrimaud wrote: > I've already tried to contribute but my changes was never merged. > > Maybe you can use this changeset: > https://bitbucket.org/gawel/webob/changeset/ed29414cd65b Thanks Gael! I've pulled and merged your test additions. Cheers, Ben -- You

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Kyle Terry
I can submit tests, but I cannot take the lead. I am always free to code after 17:30 PST Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.com On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Danny Navarro wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Mariano Mara > wrote: > > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Danny Navarro
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Mariano Mara wrote: > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33 -0300 2010: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: >> > I've been ignoring the fact that WebOb has very light test coverage for >> > a while now, but I

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Gael Pasgrimaud
Hi, I've already tried to contribute but my changes was never merged. Maybe you can use this changeset: https://bitbucket.org/gawel/webob/changeset/ed29414cd65b Regards, Gael On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Mariano Mara wrote: > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Mariano Mara
Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33 -0300 2010: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: > > I've been ignoring the fact that WebOb has very light test coverage for > > a while now, but I've just run into a bug that makes it clear that my > > bli

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: > I've been ignoring the fact that WebOb has very light test coverage for > a while now, but I've just run into a bug that makes it clear that my > blissful head-in-the-sand days are nearing an end. > > Is anyone interested in leadin

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Mariano Mara
Excerpts from Chris McDonough's message of Thu Dec 30 03:41:45 -0300 2010: > I've been ignoring the fact that WebOb has very light test coverage for > a while now, but I've just run into a bug that makes it clear that my > blissful head-in-the-sand days are nearing an end. > > Is anyone interested

Re: help on webob

2010-12-30 Thread Danny Navarro
Hi Chris, I'm interested in this task but would be able to work on it intermittently. If no one else volunteers I can take it. On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: > I've been ignoring the fact that WebOb has very light test coverage for > a while now, but I've just run into a