On Jul 4, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/03/2013 11:12 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
>>
>>> The thing is, WebHelpers has always tried to avoid dependencies so
>>> that it can be used
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/03/2013 11:12 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
>
>> The thing is, WebHelpers has always tried to avoid dependencies so
>> that it can be used in the widest variety of use cases. It now
>> depends on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2013 11:12 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> The thing is, WebHelpers has always tried to avoid dependencies so
> that it can be used in the widest variety of use cases. It now
> depends on MarkupSafe because that's a small best-of-breed security
> enh
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jason McKellar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
>> Maybe I should just ask the list: is lxml suitable as a tag generator
>> for webhelpers2.html? Or is it too big for a general-purpose library,
>> not everyone of which will be generating H
On Jul 3, 2013, at 21:53, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/03/2013 02:09 PM, Jason McKellar wrote:
>
>> I may be in the minority about dependencies, but I really don't mind
>> have extra dependencies if they are the right tool. It doesn't hurt
>> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2013 02:09 PM, Jason McKellar wrote:
> I may be in the minority about dependencies, but I really don't mind
> have extra dependencies if they are the right tool. It doesn't hurt
> that I use lxml in most of my Pyramid applications anyway.
I
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Wichert Akkerman
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 28, 2013, at 23:04 , Mike Orr wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm thinking about rewriting the low-level HTML tag generator in
>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2013, at 23:04 , Mike Orr wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking about rewriting the low-level HTML tag generator in
>> WebHelpers2, and wondering if there's an existing library that w
Just read this thread and thought maybe our very simple tag generator in
yafowil could be of interest - even if it does not meet the all the
expectations you wrote about.
Its plays nice with json in data tags and also has a plugin point for a
simple translation system (used currently with Zope
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2013, at 23:04 , Mike Orr wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about rewriting the low-level HTML tag generator in
> WebHelpers2, and wondering if there's an existing library that would be
> worth using in this HTML 5/Python 2.6+ world.
>
On Jun 28, 2013, at 23:04 , Mike Orr wrote:
> I'm thinking about rewriting the low-level HTML tag generator in WebHelpers2,
> and wondering if there's an existing library that would be worth using in
> this HTML 5/Python 2.6+ world.
In rare situations where I can't use a template library I us
I implemented the 'class', 'class_',' and 'style' list arguments.
Version b3 looks like it was never frozen for release, so that will be
the next version. My next steps, not necessarily in this order, are:
reimplementing the HTML builder, converting the tests to py.test, the
Python 3 port, and some
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:04:08PM -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>> I'd also like feedback on another idea. I'm thinking about adding arguments
>> to build up the class attribute and style attribute piecemeal:
>>
>> make_tag(..., classes=["foo
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:04:08PM -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> I'd also like feedback on another idea. I'm thinking about adding arguments
> to build up the class attribute and style attribute piecemeal:
>
> make_tag(..., classes=["foo", "bar"]) => ' ... class="foo bar"'
>
> make_tag(..., s
Version b3 converts arguments like "data_a_b" to "data-a-b". It's not in
PyPI (I must have forgotten that step) but it's in the source. Version b4
will probably be out this weekend, with at least 'classes' and 'styles',
because I need that for a project.
There was some discussion about whether the
On Friday, June 28, 2013 5:04:08 PM UTC-4, Mike Orr wrote:
>
>
> Are there any other syntactic sugar patterns that would be helpful in a
> Javascript-rich or HTML 5 application?
>
you should support html5 custom data attributes , the *data-** syntax.
ie:
http://example.com"; data-a="1" d
16 matches
Mail list logo
