Re: Pylons, WSGI and threading

2009-03-23 Thread Damjan
> > The problem with using Pylons as a web-framework on top of it comes > > from the fact that some parts of Pylons (beaker, routes) rely on the > > python threading libraries for things like locking and thread locals. > > Thus there is a hard coded assumption that pylons apps will always be > >

Re: Pylons, WSGI and threading

2009-03-16 Thread Damjan
> The problem with using Pylons as a web-framework on top of it comes > from the fact that some parts of Pylons (beaker, routes) rely on the > python threading libraries for things like locking and thread locals. > Thus there is a hard coded assumption that pylons apps will always be > deployed in

Re: Pylons, WSGI and threading

2009-03-13 Thread David Pratt
Hi Henk. Haven't had a good chance to look at your project yet. Always interested in new wsgi implementations. Sounds interesting what you are doing. Recommend you jump on #repoze irc to talk about this. You will normally find a great group with plenty expertise to talk about this sort of