Re: ATTN: Please keep general discussion on pylons-discuss

2011-04-04 Thread Ben Bangert
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Chris Withers wrote: > Well, what has been happening, certainly from a (relatively) innocent > bystanders point of view is that it's all been on -devel up until now. > >> The two lists are meant to be a convenience for users, > > users, or developers? Both. But obv

Re: ATTN: Please keep general discussion on pylons-discuss

2011-04-04 Thread Chris Withers
On 31/03/2011 18:58, Mike Orr wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Chris Withers wrote: On 15/03/2011 20:01, Ben Bangert wrote: Here's a quick way to know which one to post to: pylons-devel - Discussion about development of pylons project libraries such as pylons/pyramid/etc. pylons-discu

Re: ATTN: Please keep general discussion on pylons-discuss

2011-03-31 Thread Mike Orr
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > On 15/03/2011 20:01, Ben Bangert wrote: >> >> Here's a quick way to know which one to post to: >> pylons-devel >> - Discussion about development of pylons project libraries such as >> pylons/pyramid/etc. >> >> pylons-discuss >> - General disc

Re: ATTN: Please keep general discussion on pylons-discuss

2011-03-31 Thread Ben Bangert
On Mar 31, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > How about just merging the lists? As far as I know, Google Groups has no 'merge' option. > Is there really so much volume as to justify two lists? Well, the -devel is intentionally lower traffic so those more concerned about the development o

Re: ATTN: Please keep general discussion on pylons-discuss

2011-03-31 Thread Chris Withers
On 15/03/2011 20:01, Ben Bangert wrote: Here's a quick way to know which one to post to: pylons-devel - Discussion about development of pylons project libraries such as pylons/pyramid/etc. pylons-discuss - General discussion about best practices of development, asking for help, etc. How about