Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Gael Pasgrimaud
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 00:46 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alexandre Conrad >> wrote: >> > Hey Mike, >> > >> > I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people >> > not liking the questions,

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Chris McDonough
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 00:46 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alexandre Conrad > wrote: > > Hey Mike, > > > > I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people > > not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered > > automatically by passing o

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Andrew Sawyers
On 11/11/10 8:41 AM, "Mike Orr" wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michael Haubenwallner > wrote: >> On Nov 11, 8:11 am, Alexandre Conrad >> wrote: >>> >>> We could also have just a bare bone Pyramid app with no template >>> engine an no sqla/zodb. Such a setup could be for a webservice

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Mike Orr
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > On Nov 11, 8:11 am, Alexandre Conrad > wrote: >> Hey Mike, >> >> I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people >> not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered >> automatically by passing options

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Nov 11, 8:11 am, Alexandre Conrad wrote: > Hey Mike, > > I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people > not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered > automatically by passing options such as --with-sqla --with-zodb > --with-mako --with-urldispatch, ... Ju

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Nov 11, 9:46 am, Mike Orr wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alexandre Conrad > > We could also have just a bare bone Pyramid app with no template > > engine an no sqla/zodb. Such a setup could be for a webservice app > > that only returns JSON data, no HTML. > > That sounds like a job

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 11/11/10 05:05 , Mike Orr wrote: I'd like to see one template equivalent to the Pylons 1 template, with questions for SQLAlchemy and the template engine. The templates are pretty straightforward even with the conditionals. Looking forward, we'll also need questions for auth and ZODB. (Yes, som

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Mike Orr
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: >> So this all gets into, what do you call the super Pylons template with >> questions? "pyramid" would be a nice name. Then delete pylons_basic >> and pylons_sqla because it would supercede them, and pylons_minimal >> because who needs it,

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Mike Orr
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alexandre Conrad wrote: > Hey Mike, > > I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people > not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered > automatically by passing options such as --with-sqla --with-zodb > --with-mako --with-urldi

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Alexandre Conrad
Hey Mike, I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered automatically by passing options such as --with-sqla --with-zodb --with-mako --with-urldispatch, ... Just an idea. We could also have just a bare bone Pyramid

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-10 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 11.11.2010 05:05 schrieb Mike Orr: I think we need to think strategically about Pyramid's application templates. There are already eight of them, with overlapping functionality and inconsistent names. There will probably be more templates coming, both bundled with Pyramid and separate. ChrisM

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-10 Thread Chris McDonough
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 20:05 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: > I think we need to think strategically about Pyramid's application > templates. Agreed. > There are already eight of them, with overlapping > functionality and inconsistent names. There will probably be more > templates coming, both bundled wi

Pyramid application templates

2010-11-10 Thread Mike Orr
I think we need to think strategically about Pyramid's application templates. There are already eight of them, with overlapping functionality and inconsistent names. There will probably be more templates coming, both bundled with Pyramid and separate. ChrisM has said he doesn't like conditional tem