I'm using Apache, and we compared waitress+mod_proxy vs uWSGI, and
found that uWSGI had several times better performance. We had bogdowns
at high loads but they disappeared when we switched to uWSGI.
The tradeoff is that uWSGI is complex to configure and troubleshoot,
and we had to locally compile
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Bastian Kuberek wrote:
> Could you please provide some brief reasoning on why ZODB is so brilliant? I
> have learned about it a few years ago when getting into pyramid but I have
> never used or seen it being used. I would love to get some insight on why I
> would
I use nginx+waitress in production. Except once in a blue moon I've used
gunicorn for something with long persistent connections. (Streaming music
server, anything that uses socket.io, etc...)
Chris
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Bastian Kuberek wrote:
> Like others, I do also deploy produc
Like others, I do also deploy production using Nginx and uWSGI. For
development I use just waitress or uWSGI, depending on the project and how
much infrastructure has been built.
On Thursday, September 24, 2015 at 12:25:14 PM UTC-4, Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> What's the recommended wsg
Could you please provide some brief reasoning on why ZODB is so brilliant?
I have learned about it a few years ago when getting into pyramid but I
have never used or seen it being used. I would love to get some insight on
why I would use it and what would be a good use case to use it.
Thanks!
