On 16/05/2011 19:46, Michael Merickel wrote:
I really don't like the idea of the abort(404) API providing no way to
provide a custom 404 page,
I don't think anything Chris has said suggests you wouldn't be able to
provide a customer 404 page...
that's why I mention marrying the two. And
cal
Hi All,
I'm looking for the equivalent of the following:
http://packages.python.org/testfixtures/development.html
...for Pylon project packages. In short, for any package, what's the
"right" way to:
- get a development environment ready including setting up a virtualenv,
installing the pack
On 16/05/2011 19:42, Stephen Lacy wrote:
design. I'm not fond of thinking of things like access violations as
"exceptions".
Oh, I very much am. It's much easier and more powerful to, at any point,
raise a "whoa, you're not allowed to do that!" exception, and not have
to worry about all the i
I really don't like the idea of the abort(404) API providing no way to
provide a custom 404 page, that's why I mention marrying the two. And
calling it abort(404) in no way implies that this is different from
NotFound.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
This whole discussion (and current implementation of returns or raises for
httpexceptions) seems to violate the Zen of Python: "There should be one--
and preferably only one --obvious way to do it."
Chris, what's the root issue that made you think that "return abort(401)"
would be a better API tha
On 16/05/2011 18:58, Tres Seaver wrote:
On 05/16/2011 02:27 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I've created a branch named "httpexception-utils" on GitHub which
contains an implementation of "redirect" and "abort" for Pyramid that
act like their Pylons brethren.
In short, the abort feature is used like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/16/2011 02:27 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I've created a branch named "httpexception-utils" on GitHub which
> contains an implementation of "redirect" and "abort" for Pyramid that
> act like their Pylons brethren.
>
> In short, the abort featur
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:42 -0500, Michael Merickel wrote:
> Is there any support for integrating "abort(404)" with "raise
> NotFound" such that my 404 is rendered properly? Same with
> "abort(403)" and Forbidden.
No, except in the docs I explain the difference between NotFound and
HTTPNotFound an
Is there any support for integrating "abort(404)" with "raise NotFound" such
that my 404 is rendered properly? Same with "abort(403)" and Forbidden.
I'm a little torn but more in favor of the readability of using
httpexceptions directly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
