Re: GSoC, Python 3 dependencies, Paste

2011-04-04 Thread Chris McDonough
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 18:05 +0200, Juliusz Gonera wrote: > Hi, > > I thought that it will be easier if I just post here instead of trying > to catch someone on IRC. > > I have quite a few questions regarding GSoC. First of all, I'm not quite > sure if I should propose the specific project or it

Re: ATTN: Please keep general discussion on pylons-discuss

2011-04-04 Thread Ben Bangert
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Chris Withers wrote: > Well, what has been happening, certainly from a (relatively) innocent > bystanders point of view is that it's all been on -devel up until now. > >> The two lists are meant to be a convenience for users, > > users, or developers? Both. But obv

Re: ATTN: Please keep general discussion on pylons-discuss

2011-04-04 Thread Chris Withers
On 31/03/2011 18:58, Mike Orr wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Chris Withers wrote: On 15/03/2011 20:01, Ben Bangert wrote: Here's a quick way to know which one to post to: pylons-devel - Discussion about development of pylons project libraries such as pylons/pyramid/etc. pylons-discu

Re: GSoC, Python 3 dependencies, Paste

2011-04-04 Thread Alice Bevan–McGregor
On 2011-04-04 11:31:15 -0700, Chris McDonough said: I think "researchy" describes some of the marrow stuff pretty well (that doesn't imply bad, unusable or unstable, it just implies opinionatedness that is outside the current mainstream). For example, in this message you've quoted use of a fut

Re: GSoC, Python 3 dependencies, Paste

2011-04-04 Thread Chris McDonough
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 10:52 -0700, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote: > > Regarding Paste and comments on > > https://github.com/Pylons/pyramid/wiki/Pyramid-2-Brainstorm: > > > > 1. YAML vs INI - is there any decision? > > There isn't any particular reason not to go with both, INI for > backwards comp

Re: GSoC, Python 3 dependencies, Paste

2011-04-04 Thread Alice Bevan–McGregor
Regarding Paste and comments on https://github.com/Pylons/pyramid/wiki/Pyramid-2-Brainstorm: 1. YAML vs INI - is there any decision? There isn't any particular reason not to go with both, INI for backwards compatibility (using similar logic to YAML's parsing of lists, numbers, etc., and YAML

Re: GSoC, Python 3 dependencies, Paste

2011-04-04 Thread Daniel Holth
IIRC Pyramid doesn't really depend on Paste in any important way. You could just try to get it working under CherryPy, uWSGI or wsgiref for example, and get the configuration dictionary some other way besides having Paste parse .ini into {}. I hope Ian's Web Application Format proposal gets spe

Re: GSoC, Python 3 dependencies, Paste

2011-04-04 Thread Joe Dallago
I also plan on helping port Pyramid to Python 3 as my GSOC project. You can check out my application on my blog(jayd3e.com) for more details. As far as Paste goes, it has unofficially been decided that we will be going with an entirely separate HTTP server, as opposed to isolating 'paster serve'.

GSoC, Python 3 dependencies, Paste

2011-04-04 Thread Juliusz Gonera
Hi, I thought that it will be easier if I just post here instead of trying to catch someone on IRC. I have quite a few questions regarding GSoC. First of all, I'm not quite sure if I should propose the specific project or it should be given to me by one of the mentors. I was thinking about p