Re: #405: [Patch] Split up @validate

2009-11-19 Thread Marcus Cavanaugh
On Nov 19, 7:32 pm, Mike Orr wrote: > We can clone django-forms, but we definitely can't depend on Django. > That would make poor Noah throw himself off one of the Northern > California cliffs. Ha! It'd be a good exercise to pull out django forms, if for no other reason than so that I don't have

Re: [Pylons] #405: [Patch] Split up @validate

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Orr
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Ben Bangert wrote: > On Nov 19, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Mike Orr wrote: > > It's not just the lack of documentation. It does things downright weird. > It's also pretty much unmaintained. Sure, patches will be applied usually, > but other than that, its 'done'. For

Re: [Pylons] #405: [Patch] Split up @validate

2009-11-19 Thread Ben Bangert
On Nov 19, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Mike Orr wrote: > Writing a FormEncode manual is next on my plate after the WebHelpers > docs. I't'll cover the missing pieces: when to use schema, how to use > validators with a framework, how to write a FancyValidator with > advanced features (although I don't really

Fwd: [Pylons] #405: [Patch] Split up @validate

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Orr
-- Forwarded message -- #405: [Patch] Split up @validate Comment(by Ben Bangert):  I'm rather tempted to go with Marcus's idea:  http://marcuscavanaugh.com/posts/pylons-django-forms/  Though of course it kind of sucks to need Django as a dependency just to  do forms. I do like th