Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Mike Orr
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 06:25 -0700, Mike Orr wrote: >> >> Perhaps we could have an IRC documentation party this Saturday and go >> over how the documentation is structured and make some decisions on >> how the subprojects should integrate wit

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Graham Higgins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23 Jun 2009, at 02:18, Kyle VanderBeek wrote: > Fixing the "Contributing" link might help others clone the "official" > repo and start sending in patches: Given that the source for the PylonsHQ website itself is on bitbucket: http://bitbucket.

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Iain Duncan
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 11:11 -0700, Kyle VanderBeek wrote: > On Jun 22, 11:40 pm, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > > Kyle VanderBeek schrieb: > > > > > Fixing the "Contributing" link might help others clone the "official" > > > repo and start sending in patches: > > > > I've already reported this seve

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
On Jun 22, 11:40 pm, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > Kyle VanderBeek schrieb: > > > Fixing the "Contributing" link might help others clone the "official" > > repo and start sending in patches: > > I've already reported this several times, but nobody cared. This was > indeed not very encouraging for

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Iain Duncan
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 06:25 -0700, Mike Orr wrote: > > Perhaps we could have an IRC documentation party this Saturday and go > over how the documentation is structured and make some decisions on > how the subprojects should integrate with the Pylons site and a common > format for them so they're

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Iain Duncan
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:40 +0200, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > Kyle VanderBeek schrieb: > > Fixing the "Contributing" link might help others clone the "official" > > repo and start sending in patches: > > I've already reported this several times, but nobody cared. This was > indeed not very enc

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Domen Kožar
That's seems like a great idea. On Jun 23, 3:25 pm, Mike Orr wrote: > Perhaps we could have an IRC documentation party this Saturday and go > over how the documentation is structured and make some decisions on > how the subprojects should integrate with the Pylons site and a common > format for

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Mike Orr
Perhaps we could have an IRC documentation party this Saturday and go over how the documentation is structured and make some decisions on how the subprojects should integrate with the Pylons site and a common format for them so they're not all going off in different directions depending on who's w

Re: pylons future plans?

2009-06-23 Thread Mike Orr
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > > Kyle VanderBeek schrieb: >> Fixing the "Contributing" link might help others clone the "official" >> repo and start sending in patches: > > I've already reported this several times, but nobody cared. This was > indeed not very encour