Am 01.12.2011 00:27, schrieb Richard Jones:
> On 1 December 2011 10:07, Carl Karsten wrote:
>> They are not needed for legitimate use.
>
> I respectfully disagree. It's significantly easier to promote:
>
>j.mp/mpug
>
> than
>
>wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG
If you want to promote i
On 1 December 2011 10:07, Carl Karsten wrote:
> They are not needed for legitimate use.
I respectfully disagree. It's significantly easier to promote:
j.mp/mpug
than
wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG
Richard
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
> Richard> BTW why are bit.ly links disallowed in wiki pages? I definitely
> Richard> promote the j.mp URL these days over the bit.ly one but they're
> Richard> effectively the same (same company).
>
> It looks like Paul Boddie added added bit.ly,
Richard> Thanks for the spam vigilance - I got a change notification
Richard> email and the edit stuck so I wonder what could've caused the
Richard> error?
That's a strange one. I eventually found the log file and saw the warning
about bit.ly URLs, so I just deleted it.
Richard>
On 1 December 2011 01:41, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> Trying to back out the latest (spam) change to the MelbournePUG wiki page
> I'm getting an Internal Server Error response. I'd go look up the error
> message but I can never figure out where the log files live.
Thanks for the spam vigilance - I g
Trying to back out the latest (spam) change to the MelbournePUG wiki page
I'm getting an Internal Server Error response. I'd go look up the error
message but I can never figure out where the log files live.
Skip
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-w
