Re: [pve-devel] Feature Request - HA for KVM Templates?

2020-07-03 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> How difficult would it be to add functionality to Proxmox, such that > templates on shared storage (or Ceph) could be HA as well, and available > across the cluster? AFAIK this is already implemented. Simply mark the template as HA. Already tried that? ___

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-10 Thread Daniel Berteaud
- Le 10 Oct 19, à 15:02, Gilberto Nunes gilberto.nune...@gmail.com a écrit : > Perhaps an image can talk more than me > > > https://pasteboard.co/IBkiuYL.png Understood, but in the rare cases like this where you would need one VirtIO SCSI and one LSI SCSI controler, can't you just use Vi

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-10 Thread Gilberto Nunes
Perhaps an image can talk more than me https://pasteboard.co/IBkiuYL.png --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 3025-5907 (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Skype: gilberto.nunes36 Em qui, 10 de out de 2019 às 09:30, Daniel Berteaud < dan...@firewall-services.com> escreveu: > > > -

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-10 Thread Daniel Berteaud
- Le 10 Oct 19, à 14:09, Gilberto Nunes gilberto.nune...@gmail.com a écrit : > Consider this... (And this happen to me, recently). > I have to use a VM with Windows XP, in order to have some sort of system > running properly... > First, I install the VM using LSI or whatever... > But now, I

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-10 Thread Gilberto Nunes
À: "pve-devel" > Cc: "Thomas Lamprecht" > Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Octobre 2019 16:06:25 > Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Feature request > > Oh! Not at all! I just use LSI or MegaRaid as an example!... > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > > (47) 3025-5907 > (4

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-09 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
#x27;t see when you need to use both. - Mail original - De: "Gilberto Nunes" À: "pve-devel" Cc: "Thomas Lamprecht" Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Octobre 2019 16:06:25 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Feature request Oh! Not at all! I just use LSI or MegaRaid as an example!... -

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-09 Thread Gilberto Nunes
I or megaraid controller if > you have already virtio-scsi working ? > > > - Mail original - > De: "Gilberto Nunes" > À: "Thomas Lamprecht" > Cc: "pve-devel" > Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Octobre 2019 14:10:58 > Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Featu

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-09 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
Do you have a specific need to use "slow" LSI or megaraid controller if you have already virtio-scsi working ? - Mail original - De: "Gilberto Nunes" À: "Thomas Lamprecht" Cc: "pve-devel" Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Octobre 2019 14:10:58 Objet: Re: [

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-09 Thread Gilberto Nunes
For instance I am using a VM with has only one SCSI Controller... But, without down the VM, I want add a new Controller in order to add a second HDD, but using other controller, like LSI or MegaRAID! I have a situation here, which I hava a Windows VM, using Virtio as a SCSI Controller, but I wa

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-08 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 10/8/19 8:02 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > I meant the hability to click in Add buton, in web gui, in order to add > more then one SCSI Controller, other than already show in hardware > configuration. > what's the use case or gain? > https://pasteboard.co/IB3piA6.png returns 404

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-08 Thread Gilberto Nunes
I meant the hability to click in Add buton, in web gui, in order to add more then one SCSI Controller, other than already show in hardware configuration. https://pasteboard.co/IB3piA6.png --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 3025-5907 (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Skype: gilberto.nunes36

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request

2019-10-08 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
Hi, on qemu side, they are already 2 controllers (1 for scsi disk 1-7 , and 1 for scsi disk 7-14) Exception is virtio-scsi-single, where you have 1 controller by disk. (for iothread) what do you want to do exactly ? - Mail original - De: "Gilberto Nunes" À: "pve-devel" Envoyé: Mardi

Re: [pve-devel] feature request for API

2017-04-12 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > Sorry, I do not understand the purpose of this - please can you explain > a bit more? I think we simple do not have that information on the server side. > The idea behind this request is to support some kind of event driven la

Re: [pve-devel] feature request for API

2017-04-11 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> API: It would be very useful if every object had a last changed > attribute alternatively a request taking a timestamp as input which > only returned changes since this timestamp. Sorry, I do not understand the purpose of this - please can you explain a bit more? I think we simple do not have

Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI

2015-11-12 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> >>There are some ideas, but nothing implemented so far ... > > I think I had implemented it at the begin but Wolfang remove it because of > security concern. AFAIK that code is still there. Passing /dev/xyz is perfectly valid, but this user does not want to mount the disk. > Maybe could be h

Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI

2015-11-12 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
ething else like hostdevX for example) - Mail original - De: "dietmar" À: "pve-devel" Envoyé: Vendredi 13 Novembre 2015 06:51:33 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI There are some ideas, but nothing implemented so far ..

Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI

2015-11-12 Thread lyt_yudi
> 在 2015年11月13日,下午1:51,Dietmar Maurer 写道: > > There are some ideas, but nothing implemented so far ... Hope good news , Thanks___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI

2015-11-12 Thread Dietmar Maurer
There are some ideas, but nothing implemented so far ... On 11/13/2015 06:10 AM, lyt_yudi wrote: hi, this feature isn’t planned? and isn’t support too in future ? in this post: add device option for lxc. http://askubuntu.com/questions/528161/how-to-make-a-hdd-device-file-dev-sdxy-available-in-

Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI

2015-11-12 Thread lyt_yudi
> 在 2015年11月12日,下午11:30,lyt_yudi 写道: > > thanks, > > I want to direct use the block device, not use mount a disk to the > directory inside the container > > the resize feature isn’t so important for me, because here to use the whole > disk . > hi, this feature isn’t planned? and isn’t

Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI

2015-11-12 Thread lyt_yudi
> 在 2015年11月12日,下午11:06,Emmanuel Kasper 写道: > > Hi lyt_yudi > > You can already do this, but it is not implemented in the GUI > > mp0: local:102/vm-102-disk-3.raw,mp=/mnt/,size=1G > mp1: /dev/dm-3,mp=/mnt1/,size=1G > > > mp0 will mount here a disk image to /mnt > mp1 will mount the block dev

Re: [pve-devel] [Feature request] add disk for lxc from the API and WebUI

2015-11-12 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
On 11/12/2015 04:01 PM, lyt_yudi wrote: > hi,all > > current, add disk for the lxc from cli. like this > > # cat /etc/pve/lxc/100.conf > arch: amd64 > cpulimit: 2 > cpuunits: 1024 > hostname: test > memory: 2048 > net0: > bridge=vmbr0,hwaddr=F2:07:24:D6:DE:28,ip=172.16.1.100/12,name=eth0,type=ve

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request: LDAP non-anonymous bind

2015-10-09 Thread Andreas Steinel
Hi all, Due to the lack of non-anonymous bind, i solved it by building a replicating ldap instance only bind to localhost on each proxmox node. This is a pain in the ass and very error prone - especially on schema changes, which have to be propagated to all nodes. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:57 AM,

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request: LDAP non-anonymous bind

2015-10-08 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> Any news on adding those few lines to master regarding LDAP > non-anonymous bind? IMHO this is a security risk (adding plain text passwords to www-data readable files) ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bi

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request: LDAP non-anonymous bind

2015-10-08 Thread Sten Aus
Any news on adding those few lines to master regarding LDAP non-anonymous bind? On 07.09.15 16:25, Sten Aus wrote: Hi I would like to propse a feature: LDAP non-anonymous bind. As it has been discussed already in forums I will link it here as well: http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/14649-LDAP-

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-11 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
erful. - Mail original - De: "datanom.net" À: "pve-devel" Envoyé: Mardi 9 Juin 2015 21:17:52 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ? On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:07:47 +0200 Stefan Priebe wrote: > > +1 - no it does no

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:52:53 +0200 (CEST) Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > > I tested it, the order is fine, but the problem is that the grid is not > refreshed > > Only way of solving this is to resort the grid every time a new row is added. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public Gn

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-10 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
pid X old tasks : pid 0 Doing a f5 to refresh all 3) long-running task : pid X new-task (finished) : pid 0 old tasks : pid 0 - Mail original - De: "aderumier" À: "Emmanuel Kasper" Cc: "pve-devel" Envoyé: Mercredi 10 Juin 2015 18:43:59 Objet: Re: [pve-

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-10 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
quot;pve-devel" Envoyé: Mercredi 10 Juin 2015 11:36:17 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ? Hello Stefan On 06/09/2015 09:07 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote: > > Am 09.06.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Dietmar Maurer: >>> Sometimes som

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-10 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
Hello Stefan On 06/09/2015 09:07 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote: > > Am 09.06.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Dietmar Maurer: >>> Sometimes some long running tasks (move disk for example), can take >>> hours, >>> and are lost inside the other logs, need to scroll to find them,... >> >> I guess this is a bug then.

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-09 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:07:47 +0200 Stefan Priebe wrote: > > +1 - no it does not +1 And if its open season for feature requests I would love to see stats for sensor readings on hosts. Especially CPU and System temperature and fan speed. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-09 Thread Stefan Priebe
Am 09.06.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Dietmar Maurer: Sometimes some long running tasks (move disk for example), can take hours, and are lost inside the other logs, need to scroll to find them,... I guess this is a bug then. I thought task sorting should already keep running tasks on top. +1 - no i

Re: [pve-devel] feature request : pve-manager tasks grid : keep running tasks on top ?

2015-06-09 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> Sometimes some long running tasks (move disk for example), can take hours, > and are lost inside the other logs, need to scroll to find them,... I guess this is a bug then. I thought task sorting should already keep running tasks on top. ___ pve-deve