Hi,
this does fix an issue when the receiving side has the most recent
snapshot, but not the 'old_snap' one. And of course testing for
'last_snap' is correct, since that one is the relevant one for the
incremental sync. With that:
Reviewed-By: Fabian Ebner
Tested-By: Fabian Ebner
Some idea
The call to the zfs list contains the snapshot.
If the snapshot does not exist, the command is returned with an error that we
are catching.
> On March 18, 2020 8:02 AM Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
>
> Why does the patch ignore the output from the command?
>
> > On March 18, 2020 7:51 AM Wolfgang
Why does the patch ignore the output from the command?
> On March 18, 2020 7:51 AM Wolfgang Link wrote:
>
>
> For an incremental sync you need the last_snap on both sides.
> ---
> pve-zsync | 13 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/pve-zsync b/pve
