On 10/23/19 10:51 AM, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> On 10/23/19 10:32 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>> two small nits on individual patches (could also be done as follow-ups,
>> but it requires a rebase already anyway), others looks good to go from
>> my side :)
>>
>> thanks for the patience and work!
>>
On 10/23/19 10:32 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
two small nits on individual patches (could also be done as follow-ups,
but it requires a rebase already anyway), others looks good to go from
my side :)
thanks for the patience and work!
I'll rebase and fix the nits, then send it (hopefully) on
two small nits on individual patches (could also be done as follow-ups,
but it requires a rebase already anyway), others looks good to go from
my side :)
thanks for the patience and work!
On October 15, 2019 4:12 pm, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> Based on the RFC and following on- and off-list discuss
Sorry, that's supposed to be v5 in the subject...
On 10/15/19 4:12 PM, Stefan Reiter wrote:
Based on the RFC and following on- and off-list discussion about custom CPU
models [0].
In essence, this revised patch allows a user to specify custom CPU models in
/etc/pve/cpu-models.conf (section-conf
