maybe maintain a pve-qemu package in same repo than ceph could be better ?
- Mail original -
De: "aderumier"
À: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 25 Septembre 2017 15:53:09
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question about pve-qemu && librbd
>>but for other use cases, w
is it for proxmox team to mainain 2
version)
- Mail original -
De: "Fabian Grünbichler"
À: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 25 Septembre 2017 15:29:20
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question about pve-qemu && librbd
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Alexandre DERUMIER
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> >>there might be some yet undiscovered incompatibility when mixing versions
> >>like
> >>that (there are other ceph libraries with reverse-dependencies to
> >>consider as well)
>
> But proxmox 5.0 ceph-server only support lumin
and from client side, librbd is backward compatible to connect on older cluster
(I have tested lirbd luminous to jewel && hammer cluster without any problem)
- Mail original -
De: "Fabian Grünbichler"
À: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 25 Septembre 2017 08:15:37
Objet
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:22:27AM +0200, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> I have tested pve-qemu-kvm builded with last librbd-dev, and it's working
> fine also with jewel cluster.
>
>
> Could we bump dependencies && dev dependencies of debian pve-qemu package to
> last librbd ?
>
> (maybe put tha
proxmox ceph repo ?)
- Mail original -
De: "aderumier"
À: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Samedi 23 Septembre 2017 11:41:48
Objet: [pve-devel] question about pve-qemu && librbd
Hi,
I was trying to help some users on the forum about potention performance
regression
Hi,
I was trying to help some users on the forum about potention performance
regression
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/3000-msec-ping-and-packet-drops-with-virtio-under-load.36687/page-2
and I have build for pve-qemu-kvm with the qemu patch that wolfgang has made
some days ago.
use said m
