No, if you enable nested virtualization.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Daniel Hunsaker
wrote:
> OpenVZ would probably work just fine, but KVM would be slow, at best. The
> rest should function normally.
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015, 19:09 Lindsay Mathieson
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 31 January 2015 at 0
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:38:55 AM Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > I presume virtualisation wouldn't work, but I should be able to test the
> > zfs storage with it?
>
> Yes, but there are problems with virtio disks. It works great if
> you use lsi scsi for disks.
Thanks, good to know
_
> I presume virtualisation wouldn't work, but I should be able to test the
> zfs storage with it?
Yes, but there are problems with virtio disks. It works great if
you use lsi scsi for disks.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pv
OpenVZ would probably work just fine, but KVM would be slow, at best. The
rest should function normally.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015, 19:09 Lindsay Mathieson
wrote:
>
> On 31 January 2015 at 02:59, Martin Maurer wrote:
>
>> We just updated the pvetest repository and uploaded a lot of latest
>> package
On 31 January 2015 at 02:59, Martin Maurer wrote:
> We just updated the pvetest repository and uploaded a lot of latest
> packages required to support ZFS on Linux.
>
> Also note that we have downgraded pve-qemu-kvm from 2.2 to 2.1, because
> live migration was unstable on some hosts. So please d
Hi all,
We just updated the pvetest repository and uploaded a lot of latest packages
required to support ZFS on Linux.
Also note that we have downgraded pve-qemu-kvm from 2.2 to 2.1, because live
migration was unstable on some hosts. So please downgrade that package manually
(using and wget .
