> >>> Thought a bit more about that, and it seems to be relatively easy to
> >> implement.
> >>> But maybe 'per user group' is good enough?
> >>
> >> sounds good - but still not sure if i'm able to implement ;-(
> >
> > I already have a prototype (but I am out of office this week).
Hello everybod
Am 05.02.2014 09:12, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
>>> Thought a bit more about that, and it seems to be relatively easy to
>> implement.
>>> But maybe 'per user group' is good enough?
>>
>> sounds good - but still not sure if i'm able to implement ;-(
>
> I already have a prototype (but I am out of of
> > Thought a bit more about that, and it seems to be relatively easy to
> implement.
> > But maybe 'per user group' is good enough?
>
> sounds good - but still not sure if i'm able to implement ;-(
I already have a prototype (but I am out of office this week).
__
Hi,
Am 31.01.2014 06:25, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
>>> So one of the question is - does it make sense to introduce them per
>>> pool? per user? Or may be pre defined "packages"?
>>
>> I already made a suggestion on that (see previous mail).
>>
>> But 'per user' makes no sense for me.
>
> Thought a
> > So one of the question is - does it make sense to introduce them per
> > pool? per user? Or may be pre defined "packages"?
>
> I already made a suggestion on that (see previous mail).
>
> But 'per user' makes no sense for me.
Thought a bit more about that, and it seems to be relatively easy
> So one of the question is - does it make sense to introduce them per pool? per
> user? Or may be pre defined "packages"?
I already made a suggestion on that (see previous mail).
But 'per user' makes no sense for me.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-dev
Behalf Of Dietmar Maurer
Sent: Dienstag, 28. Jänner 2014 09:01
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG; Alexandre DERUMIER (aderum...@odiso.com)
Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] bring back disk throttle to creation wizard
I tried todo this but i fail at adding a listener to the hdpanel
f Dietmar Maurer
> Sent: Dienstag, 28. Jänner 2014 09:01
> To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG; Alexandre DERUMIER (aderum...@odiso.com)
> Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
> Subject: Re: [pve-devel] bring back disk throttle to creation wizard
>
> > I tried todo this but i fail at ad
> I tried todo this but i fail at adding a listener to the hdpanel.
I will take a look at that later.
I am currently trying to define defaults for qemu. I think we
can use a new file /etc/pve/qemu-defaults.cfg
---/etc/pve/qemu-defaults.cfg-example-
# default for all VMs
qm:
memory
I tried todo this but i fail at adding a listener to the hdpanel.
This listener is never called:
// setDrive
var hdpanel = Ext.create('PVE.qemu.HDInputPanel', {
title: gettext('Hard Disk'),
create: true,
insideWizard: true,
listeners: {
Ok yes that would be great too!
Stefan
Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone.
Am 26.01.2014 um 14:51 schrieb Dietmar Maurer :
>>> The disk window is simply too overloaded with all that IO throttle
>>> paramaters.
>>> They are totally pointless for 95% of our users.
>>
>> yes all but why no
> > The disk window is simply too overloaded with all that IO throttle
> > paramaters.
> > They are totally pointless for 95% of our users.
>
> yes all but why not keeping the 4 simple values like before and just have all
> settings in the seperate window later?
I guess the 'correct' way would b
> > The disk window is simply too overloaded with all that IO throttle
> > paramaters.
> > They are totally pointless for 95% of our users.
>
> yes all but why not keeping the 4 simple values like before
it is already grown to 8 values (too much).
> and just have all settings in the seperate w
Am 25.01.2014 10:14, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
i would like to vote for bringing back the disk throttle parameters to the
creation
The disk window is simply too overloaded with all that IO throttle paramaters.
They are totally pointless for 95% of our users.
yes all but why not keeping the
> > wizard or having a central place to setup defaults.
>
> That would work, but currently there is no central place to setup defaults.
Maybe an additional attribute on the storage definition?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http:/
> i would like to vote for bringing back the disk throttle parameters to the
> creation
The disk window is simply too overloaded with all that IO throttle paramaters.
They are totally pointless for 95% of our users.
> wizard or having a central place to setup defaults.
That would work, but cur
Hello,
i would like to vote for bringing back the disk throttle parameters to
the creation wizard or having a central place to setup defaults.
Without it it can happen very easily that you forgot to limit a disk and
then overload your storage.
Greets,
Stefan
17 matches
Mail list logo
