applied, thanks!
> My submission was rejected previously because I was not a member of pve-
> devel mailing list. I added myself to this list and I'm now re-submitting my
> patches.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxm
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:00:48 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
>
> Michael, I can't seem to recreate this. I converted a VM with the sparse
> option to a template and created a linked clone, and then backed up the
> linked clone and didn't get this error message. This is a log of my linked
> clone bac
> Your patch still needs to handle the case where a VM has been converted
> to a template since image handling after conversion complains of an
> unknown setting: sparse.
Michael, I can't seem to recreate this. I converted a VM with the sparse
option to a template and created a linked clone, and
> It might be worth trying to make a feature request to the qemu-img team
to add this option?
I'll pursue getting this feature added to qemu-img.
> Your patch still needs to handle the case where a VM has been converted
> to a template since image handling after conversion complains of an
> unkno
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:08:41 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
>
> Connecting to the target with a host group defined fails unless the
> initiator has been added to the host group, as it should be by design. If
> I manually add the initiator name ("iqn.2008-11.org.linux-kvm:")
> to the host group on the
Michael,
Thanks for testing these. If I supply you with future patches I'll try to
be a little bit more rigorous with testing before I send them in.
Connecting to the target with a host group defined fails unless the
initiator has been added to the host group, as it should be by design. If
I m
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:26:46 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Bummer, sorry it's not working. When I'm back in the office on Monday,
> I'll play with it. I've been using it with a defined target group and no
> host group so far without any problems. I have not tested a host group. I
>
Michael,
Bummer, sorry it's not working. When I'm back in the office on Monday,
I'll play with it. I've been using it with a defined target group and no
host group so far without any problems. I have not tested a host group. I
mainly wanted to be able to define a target group, because the stor
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:22:20 +0100
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> So a request like this:
> qemu-img info iscsi://192.168.3.110/iqn.2010-09.org.napp-it:omnios/0
>
> Will give this response:
> qemu-img: iSCSI: Failed to connect to LUN : SENSE
> KEY:ILLEGAL_REQUEST(5) ASCQ:INVALID_OPERATION_CODE(0x200
Hi Chris,
How have you been able to use your patch adding host and target group?
As far as I have been able to test these options are never send with
the request for access to the LUN.
So a request like this:
qemu-img info iscsi://192.168.3.110/iqn.2010-09.org.napp-it:omnios/0
Will give this res
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:24:10 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> Oops forgot to attach the script. Here's the script I mentioned.
>
I have added this line so that my MUA can sort the mail correct:
msg += 'Date: %s \n' % time.strftime("%a, %d %b %Y %X %z")
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my pu
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:24:10 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> Oops forgot to attach the script. Here's the script I mentioned.
>
Thanks.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir datanom n
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:21:43 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> 8k for me too is much better than 4k. With 4k I tend to hit my IOPS limit
> easily, with not much throughput, and I get a lot of IO delay on VMs when
> the SAN is fairly busy. Currently I'm leaning towards 16k, sparse, with
> lz4 compressi
Oops forgot to attach the script. Here's the script I mentioned.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Chris Allen wrote:
> > I have already made some test and I have not be able to make any
> > conclusive tests proving performance should be hurt by using sparse.
>
> Yeah it shouldn't affect the Z
> I have already made some test and I have not be able to make any
> conclusive tests proving performance should be hurt by using sparse.
Yeah it shouldn't affect the ZFS mechanics at all, the ZVOL will just lack
a reservation.
> Is sparse a way to provision more than a 100% then?
Yes. That, an
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:11:17 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> > It was also part of latest 3.1. Double-click the mouse over your
> > storage specification in Datacenter->storage and the panel pops up.
> > Patched panel attached.
>
I forgot to mention that at the moment the code for creating ZFS
storag
> It was also part of latest 3.1. Double-click the mouse over your
> storage specification in Datacenter->storage and the panel pops up.
> Patched panel attached.
Thank you, I was unaware of this.
> BTW. Have you made any performance measures sparse vs non-sparse and
> write cache vs no write ca
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:45:52 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> Yes. Thanks for including the patches. I was unaware of ZFSEdit.js as I
> wasn't testing this on new version of pve-manager (I was using 3.1 release).
>
It was also part of latest 3.1. Double-click the mouse over your
storage specificatio
Yes. Thanks for including the patches. I was unaware of ZFSEdit.js as I
wasn't testing this on new version of pve-manager (I was using 3.1 release).
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:14:02 -0700
> Chris Allen wrote:
>
> > My submission was
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:14:02 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> My submission was rejected previously because I was not a member of
> pve-devel mailing list. I added myself to this list and I'm now
> re-submitting my patches.
>
I have just briefly looked over the patch and can see that some
patching
Thanks, I don't have time myself to test them.
(I review them fastly, seem to be good)
- Mail original -
De: "Michael Rasmussen"
À: "Dietmar Maurer"
Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Jeudi 13 Mars 2014 08:09:52
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] ZFS Storage Patches
Hi Dietmar,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:00:10 +
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
> would you mind to review and test those patches? You are the author of the
> ZFS plugin,
> so I guess it is best if you do the review.
>
I will do the testing tomorrow or Saturday.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Subject: [pve-devel] ZFS Storage Patches
My submission was rejected previously because I was not a member of pve-devel
mailing list. I added myself to this list and I'm now re-submitting my patches.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmo
Hi Chris,
I am working on a refactor of ZFS Plugin which will decouple specific LUN
implementations from the driver, by providing a single interface for LUN
implementation by means of invoking an external script/program/binary. As
such, I will try to review your patches and incorporate "what is no
My submission was rejected previously because I was not a member of
pve-devel mailing list. I added myself to this list and I'm now
re-submitting my patches.
From 753d826597851ef8bd55b7359ff7ee1c5b579920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Allen
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:56:02 -0800
Subject: [PA
25 matches
Mail list logo
