2017-03-10 8:57 GMT+01:00 Thomas Lamprecht :
> But you always could make those two servers a cluster, even if the have no
> shared resources like stroages or such, if it's possible to do this in your
> setup.
Any drawbacks by creating a two node cluster where quorum would never reached?
Last time
>On 03/10/2017 08:51 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
>> Il 10 mar 2017 8:05 AM, "Thomas Lamprecht" ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Migration between nodes in the same cluster with no shared storage
can be
>> already achieved,
>>
>> Directly migrating in via WebUI is not yet exposed, AFAIK, but on
Il 10 mar 2017 8:05 AM, "Thomas Lamprecht" ha
scritto:
Hi,
Migration between nodes in the same cluster with no shared storage can be
already achieved,
Directly migrating in via WebUI is not yet exposed, AFAIK, but on the CLI
you may try to use
qm migrate -oneline -with-local-disks
-oneline
On 03/10/2017 06:35 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> First, thanks for your work!
>
> And thanks for your review ! :)
>
>
>> I did some shallow review of most patches, I hope most of it is somewhat
>> constructive (I had to include a few nit picks, sorry :))
>
> I'll try to take time to re
>>the refactoring that happened since).
Ok thanks. I'll try to look at this.
I don't think I'll have too much time in coming weeks until next month.
- Mail original -
De: "Fabian Grünbichler"
À: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Mars 2017 08:12:1
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 06:35:23AM +0100, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>First, thanks for your work!
>
> And thanks for your review ! :)
>
>
> >>I did some shallow review of most patches, I hope most of it is somewhat
> >>constructive (I had to include a few nit picks, sorry :))
>
>
Migration between nodes in the same cluster with no shared storage can
be already achieved,
Directly migrating in via WebUI is not yet exposed, AFAIK, but on the
CLI you may try to use
qm migrate -oneline -with-local-disks
ugh, typo: s/oneline/online/
# qm migrate -online -with-lo
Hi,
On 03/09/2017 07:49 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
Sorry for the noise but is this something we will see before 5.0?
This exactly patch set probably not, no.
I'm really interested in all regarding live migration without shared
storage
You can do this now already? This patchset is for
VM on the old cluster
>>(as mentioned in reviews: can be potentially dangerous))
At least, it should be optionnal. (we have also "disconnect" option on vm nics)
- Mail original -
De: "Thomas Lamprecht"
À: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Mars 2017 18:46:02
Sorry for the noise but is this something we will see before 5.0?
I'm really interested in all regarding live migration without shared
storage
and as I'm planning a new server with 4.4, I would like to know if this is
something I'll see in the near term without a major upgrade
Il 22 feb 2017 2:33
On 02/22/2017 02:33 PM, Alexandre Derumier wrote:
Hi,
This patches serie implement a new method
qm migrateexternal -targetstorage
to allow to live migrate+storage migrate a vm to a remote proxmox cluster,
with a new vmid on the target cluster.
Main differences with classic live storage mig
Hi,
This patches serie implement a new method
qm migrateexternal -targetstorage
to allow to live migrate+storage migrate a vm to a remote proxmox cluster,
with a new vmid on the target cluster.
Main differences with classic live storage migration:
- new vmid on target cluster
- src disks on
12 matches
Mail list logo
