> And BTW. the two plugins did use the same syntax but never the less the error
> was displayed. If you study the code in SectionConfig.pm it does not care
> whether the syntax is identical or not it merely checks whether a property has
> been defined or not.
> 'die "duplicate property" if defined(
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:01:27 +0200
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> It was just something I bump into while developing the ZFSPlugin. When
> configuring the plugin you need to enter a block size which I naturally
> named 'blocksize' but the NexentaPlugin also needing this info and this
> plugin also na
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 06:51:06 +
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
> What property/plugin do you talk about?
>
It was just something I bump into while developing the ZFSPlugin. When
configuring the plugin you need to enter a block size which I naturally
named 'blocksize' but the NexentaPlugin also need
> Above failure is displayed if two or more plugins have defined an identical
> name
> for a property so my question is: Why can a plugin not have a property by the
> same name as another plugin?
To avoid confusion. If you want the same name, it should have also the same
syntax.
What property/p
Hi Dietmar,
I am wondering about the reason for the following:
pvedaemonduplicate property at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/SectionConfig.pm
line 123
Above failure is displayed if two or more plugins have defined an
identical name for a property so my question is: Why can a plugin not
have a property by t
