Thanks, i test it and it worked for me, although to be able to see all
mounts in the GUI, we probably have to change more than one line.
2018-01-23 10:55 GMT+01:00 Andreas Steinel :
> After a discussion on the forums [1], @fabian suggested to reopen this one.
>
> What is the current way to import
After a discussion on the forums [1], @fabian suggested to reopen this one.
What is the current way to import a whole ZFS tree into a container? My
solution was to have more bind mount devices and manually add each one of
the, stupid, but easy to implement.
[1]
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/l
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> Not sure, but maybe http://bindfs.org/ can help here?
>
Could be, but fuse is not known for its speed. I'll stick with the normal
bind mounts.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
> On May 18, 2016 at 12:10 AM Andreas Steinel wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
> > > Because ZFS filesystems are cheap and should be used everywhere ... at
> > > least as I have read.
> >
> > But such setup it is really clumsy for container as long
> > as
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > Because ZFS filesystems are cheap and should be used everywhere ... at
> > least as I have read.
>
> But such setup it is really clumsy for container as long
> as there is no recursive bind mount.
>
Unfortunately, that's right. Therefore
> Because ZFS filesystems are cheap and should be used everywhere ... at
> least as I have read.
But such setup it is really clumsy for container as long
as there is no recursive bind mount.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://p
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Dietmar Maurer
wrote:
> > I have a filesystem called images with child filesystems of each year
> going
> > back to the 80s.
>
> And what is the purpose of such setup? Wouldn't it be simpler to merge
> those old child file systems into a single one?
>
Because ZF
> I have a filesystem called images with child filesystems of each year going
> back to the 80s.
And what is the purpose of such setup? Wouldn't it be simpler to merge
those old child file systems into a single one?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@
Hi Dietmar,
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
> > I needed more (bind of ZFS filesystem with a lot of children) so I
> > increased the maximum in /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Config.pm and it worked
> > fine.
>
> Would you mind to explain why you need more that 10 mounts? How m
> is there a reason for a the maximum of 10 bind mounts for lxc?
mounting is slow and clumsy to handle, for example with snapshot backups ...
> I needed more (bind of ZFS filesystem with a lot of children) so I
> increased the maximum in /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Config.pm and it worked
> fine.
W
Hi,
is there a reason for a the maximum of 10 bind mounts for lxc?
I needed more (bind of ZFS filesystem with a lot of children) so I
increased the maximum in /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Config.pm and it worked
fine.
Best,
Andreas
___
pve-devel mailing li
11 matches
Mail list logo
