On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:25:55AM +0200, Wolfgang Link wrote:
> Sorry you are right on online move disk.
> This is not optimal.
> will check it, if it is a bug or only an special case what we haven't set.
Probably a case where we forget to try to use the zeroinit filter?
>
>
> On 06/16/2016 10
> So - with the hope of a quick answer - did we do something wrong, is
> this a bug or a workaround?
This works if you stop the VM (offline). Please can you file at bug
at bugzilla.proxmox.com for this issue?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.pro
Sorry you are right on online move disk.
This is not optimal.
will check it, if it is a bug or only an special case what we haven't set.
On 06/16/2016 10:01 AM, Wolfgang Link wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Test it and move KVM disk from LVMThin to LVMThin works well new Disk
> has 80% usage as the sourc
Hello,
Test it and move KVM disk from LVMThin to LVMThin works well new Disk
has 80% usage as the source.
On 06/16/2016 09:13 AM, Dennis Busch wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> We're right now holding a training in Verona. It is the first one with
> LVMthin. In our hands-on parts we recognized that if
Good morning!
We're right now holding a training in Verona. It is the first one with
LVMthin. In our hands-on parts we recognized that if you're moving a
disk from a thin provisioned LVM storage to another one, the target
volume is filled to 100% and so the thin provisioning is completely gone.
M
