On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 5/29/19 10:50 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> > I wonder whether we should support clusters without link0 as well? might
> > happen easily:
> >
> > cluster only has link0 configured
> > network topology change, add new link1
>
On 5/29/19 10:50 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> I wonder whether we should support clusters without link0 as well? might
> happen easily:
>
> cluster only has link0 configured
> network topology change, add new link1
> deconfigure link0
>
> cluster joining no longer possible without specifying a
On 5/29/19 10:50 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 06:33:12PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> Similar to the change to cluster creation use now also the
>> corosync-link definition for the rest of the cluster join/add calls.
>>
>> What could be a bit strange is that bindnet
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 06:33:12PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Similar to the change to cluster creation use now also the
> corosync-link definition for the rest of the cluster join/add calls.
>
> What could be a bit strange is that bindnet shows here up too in the
> schema definition, while
Similar to the change to cluster creation use now also the
corosync-link definition for the rest of the cluster join/add calls.
What could be a bit strange is that bindnet shows here up too in the
schema definition, while it's documented that it's only really used
for cluster created we may want t
