Re: [pve-devel] proxmox 2018 : add support for "virtual" network and network plugins ?

2018-01-30 Thread Herman Bos
On 30 January 2018 at 14:32, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > >>I understand what your getting at, but to avoid confusion I would suggest > >>to skip the term symmetric routing here (which would suggest that data > >>to/from follows the same path), > >>routed traffic is usually very asymmetric. > > I

Re: [pve-devel] proxmox 2018 : add support for "virtual" network and network plugins ?

2018-01-30 Thread Herman Bos
On Jan 30, 2018 09:19, "Alexandre DERUMIER" wrote: 2)if a routing protocol exist between the proxmox nodes and the router, the router can send directly traffic to the correct proxmox node. (symetric routing). I understand what your getting at, but to avoid confusion I would suggest to skip the

Re: [pve-devel] proxmox 2018 : add support for "virtual" network and network plugins ?

2018-01-29 Thread Herman Bos
lly, I could be possible to do communication between kubernetes > network and a proxmox vm on same vxlan. (without need to nat to exit > kubernetes network) > > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Herman Bos" > À: "pve-devel" > Cc: "a

Re: [pve-devel] proxmox 2018 : add support for "virtual" network and network plugins ?

2018-01-29 Thread Herman Bos
https://github.com/containernetworking ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] proxmox 2018 : add support for "virtual" network and network plugins ?

2018-01-29 Thread Herman Bos
On 29 January 2018 at 12:22, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > Looks we simply need a flexible plugin architecture ... > > You could take a look at how kubernetes does it. If somehow you can keep it compatible you can get lots of stuff for free. :-) https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administr

Re: [pve-devel] proxmox 2018 : add support for "virtual" network and network plugins ?

2018-01-29 Thread Herman Bos
On 29 January 2018 at 11:46, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > > It's not difficult if we can do bgp to the router. but I think Dietmar > want something > for user with a simple router/default gw. (so with some proxy-arp trick). > I would avoid proxy-arp as well. just embrace layer3. keep it clean. :-

Re: [pve-devel] proxmox 2018 : add support for "virtual" network and network plugins ?

2018-01-29 Thread Herman Bos
On 26 January 2018 at 12:12, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > I have talked with my network engineer, > > he's only see 2 possibility: > > > 1 use floating-ip/nat 1:1 on compute node and translate to vm private > address > (so external router see mac-adress of compute node for the floating ip) > > or

Re: [pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster (100nodes), get rid of corosync ?

2016-09-21 Thread Herman Bos
On 20 September 2016 at 07:43, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > One thing that I think it could be great, > > is to be able to have unique vmid across differents proxmox clusters. > > maybe with a letter prefix for example (cluster1: vmid: a100 , cluster2: > vmid:b100). > > Like this, it could be poss

[pve-devel] pvestatd, influxdb

2015-10-09 Thread Herman Bos
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commit;h=c7f3e2abe2626c27147be84f4bd09a7c91348297 should sending stats to influxdb (pve 4.0) be working or are there still some missing pieces? At least it seems pretty undocumented. :-) Thanks, Herman ___ p