seem that redhat && ubuntu have disabled lttng for now, because of
apparmor|selinux restriction
lttng is enabled by default since
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4261
Don't known what is the best way, add rule in apparmor or disabling lttng
(which need to maintain ceph / ceph-server packages
redhat bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=1223319
- Mail original -
De: "aderumier"
À: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Samedi 10 Octobre 2015 18:26:49
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] librbd missing from proxmox 4 repository
https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/775
Not sure, b
https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/775
Not sure, but maybe this is related to apparmor
- Mail original -
De: "aderumier"
À: "dietmar"
Cc: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Samedi 10 Octobre 2015 18:00:08
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] librbd missing from proxmox 4 repository
>>Yes. I am just a bit afraid because
>>Yes. I am just a bit afraid because of those strange warnings messages
>>when we install hammer version:
Ok, maybe for now, just uploaded last firefly package to proxmox jessie repo.
(I think I have see some users reported proxmox4 upgrade failure because of
librbd)
>>libust[22611/22611]: Wa
> I think we should add lirbd package is proxmox4 repository like before.
> (and maybe add librbd from hammer version directly)
Yes. I am just a bit afraid because of those strange warnings messages
when we install hammer version:
libust[22611/22611]: Warning: HOME environment variable not set.
D
Hi,
I see that librbd is missing from proxmox repository.
That mean that debian package are used (0.80.7), but they lower than
previous proxmox 3 repository (0.80.8).
I think we should add lirbd package is proxmox4 repository like before.
(and maybe add librbd from hammer version directly)
Re
> On October 10, 2015 at 1:30 PM Lindsay Mathieson
> wrote:
>
>
> Both those only list the size in MB or GB
ceph blocks are 4MB, so I guess that is good enough.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mai
Both those only list the size in MB or GB
On 10 October 2015 at 19:39, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> I guess with
>
> # rbd ls -l --pool
>
> or rbd info
>
> # rbd info vm--disk-XXX --pool
>
> > But for future reference, how does one get the exact size of a ceph
> image?
>
>
--
Lindsay
___
I guess with
# rbd ls -l --pool
or rbd info
# rbd info vm--disk-XXX --pool
> But for future reference, how does one get the exact size of a ceph image?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/list
> Am 10.10.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Dietmar Maurer :
>
>> - when selecting any of my servers in the tree on the left and selecting
>> 'Syslog', all I get is blank space - no output whatsoever.
>> - when selecting any of my servers in the tree on the left and selecting
>> 'Bootlog', I get the error
> - when selecting any of my servers in the tree on the left and selecting
> 'Syslog', all I get is blank space - no output whatsoever.
> - when selecting any of my servers in the tree on the left and selecting
> 'Bootlog', I get the error: "Method 'GET /nodes/srv01/bootlog' not implemented
> (50
Hi there,
I just (in-place) upgraded to PVE 4. Now, there seem to be a few issues:
- when selecting any of my servers in the tree on the left and selecting
'Syslog', all I get is blank space - no output whatsoever.
- when selecting any of my servers in the tree on the left and selecting
'Boot
12 matches
Mail list logo
