Oh yes, sorry, seem better with your code.
(I'm a lot busy today, It's first day of sales in France, so lot of activity on
ecommerce websites)
- Mail original -
De: "dietmar"
À: "pve-devel" , "aderumier"
Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Janvier 2015 08:35:00
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 2/7] add o
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Link
---
PVE/AccessControl.pm |7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/PVE/AccessControl.pm b/PVE/AccessControl.pm
index db85d08..29dba39 100644
--- a/PVE/AccessControl.pm
+++ b/PVE/AccessControl.pm
@@ -356,8 +356,6 @@ sub check_user_enabled {
r
On 01/02/2015 03:15 PM, Alexandre Derumier wrote:
+
+ if(!$param->{current} || (defined($param->{current}) &&
$param->{current} == 0)) {
+ foreach my $opt (keys $conf->{pending}) {
+ foreach my $opt
(PVE::Tools::split_list($conf->{pending}->{delete})) {
+
On 01/02/2015 03:15 PM, Alexandre Derumier wrote:
@@ -685,11 +702,6 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
type => 'string',
optional => 1,
},
- pending => {
- description => "Pending value.",
- t
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 01:26:38 +0100
Detlef Bracker wrote:
>
> >>The problem you are having is that the default configuration for newer
> >>versions of MySQL do not work
> inside of an OpenVZ container. After the failure you can try
> adding |innodb_use_native_aio = 0| to |/etc/mysql/my.cnf| and
Dear,
their is a problem with installation mysql-server 5.5 on debian wheezy
in a proxmox container same as in openvz
Only this helps for the problem, but why?
This site give a workarround:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/152146/problems-installing-mysql-on-debian
>>The problem you are
But that don't mean that physically, the virtual cpus|numa nodes will be
mapped to correct physical cpus.
Many thanks for your reply, and please, let me to do a question:
Then, why I have a great difference of performance between the before and
the after of install your patches if i never touche
>>Being mssql into the VM, the DBA showed me as mssql can see the numa nodes,
>>and mssql has his own form of manage his own processes between the numa
>>nodes for get a better performance. It is for it that i think will be better
>>that in the PVE GUI we have the option of enable or disable the cp
(Note that I don't see how mssql can pin vcpus on real host cpu).
Being mssql into the VM, the DBA showed me as mssql can see the numa nodes,
and mssql has his own form of manage his own processes between the numa
nodes for get a better performance. It is for it that i think will be better
that i
>>ase excuse me if i don't talk with property, i meant the cpu pinning that
>>will have pve-manager and QEMU in the next release. Ie, that i would like to
>>have the option of enable or disable in PVE GUI the cpu pinning that QEMU
>>can apply for each VM, if so, i will can to choose if i want that
Hi Alexandre
Please excuse me if i don't talk with property, i meant the cpu pinning that
will have pve-manager and QEMU in the next release. Ie, that i would like to
have the option of enable or disable in PVE GUI the cpu pinning that QEMU
can apply for each VM, if so, i will can to choose if i
>>I guess that with my manuals of Dell and seeing your configuration, i will
can do it well.
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pwcnt/en/app_note_6.pdf
PowerConnect 52xx:
console# config
console(config)# ip igmp snooping
console(config)# ip igmp snooping querier
cisco is similar
Hi,
>>As i have running a VM with MS-SQL Server (and with 246 GB RAM exclusive for
>>MS-SQL Server), the DBA of MS-SQL Server says that MS-SQL Server can manage
>>his own numa-processes better than QEMU, and as i guess that also will exist
>>many applications that will manage his own numa-proce
13 matches
Mail list logo
