[pve-devel] FYI: news from the OpenVZ project

2014-12-26 Thread Dietmar Maurer
see: http://openvz.livejournal.com/49158.html ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> with HA and rgmanager - is it just auto doing what I do manually? yes, rgmanager is just an 'automated' administrator ;-) > e.g Node1 fails > > - Unplug Node1 at least make sure the VMs are stopped on Node1. > - logon to Node2 > > - mv /etc/pve/nodes/Node1/qemu-server/*.conf > /etc/pve/nod

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Cesar Peschiera
@Lindsay: Very interesting, thanks. Even it can operate without the PVE Cluster, always that you have a copy of the config of the VM. Even if personally i prefer my strategy, due that with a script in a menu options, any person will can apply "HA" without have that remember the exact command

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 10:16:38 PM Cesar Peschiera wrote: > >Is there anything else it would do? > > Have you tested that works your strategy with a node that is off and not > turned on? yes, though a while back. Storage is shared. -- Lindsay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Cesar Peschiera
@ Lindsay: - Unplug Node1 - logon to Node2 - mv /etc/pve/nodes/Node1/qemu-server/*.conf /etc/pve/nodes/Node2/qemu-server/ - Manually start VM's on Node2 Is there anything else it would do? Have you tested that works your strategy with a node that is off and not turned on? - Original

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Cesar Peschiera
I would like to correct the command that should be applied: /usr/sbin/fence_ack_manual Also tell you them that the "rgmanager" service is necessary, fence join, and "failover domain" can be necessary if you have more of two nodes. - Original Message - From: Cesar Peschiera To: G

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 06:39:37 PM Cesar Peschiera wrote: > 4) From some node that is alive, i execute manually: > /usr/sbin/fence_ack_manual > > 5) Enjoy of HA I've been manually managing the VM's on my three node cluster for now, we don't really need VM's transferred within seconds of a node fai

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Cesar Peschiera
@Gilberto: First that all, please post the messages to the pve-devel mailing list, so all people can read and correct anything that to be wrong said. Moreover, i do of this mode and order: 1) I wait that a node has some kind of problem 2) I analyze the problem (for example, maybe be a problem wi

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Cesar Peschiera
Also remember that "fence_ack_manual" is available, that it is a soft fence, it don't need a hardware of fence device, and only works when we don't have network communication with the node that have some kind of problem. - Original Message - From: "Dietmar Maurer" To: "Gilberto Nunes"

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> fence_pve?? I can't found out such fence here... Perhaps I miss some packet? > Where can I found it?? That is only in newest version from git. But again, this is not suitable for real fencing. ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http:

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Gilberto Nunes
pveversion pve-manager/3.3-5/bfebec03 (running kernel: 2.6.32-34-pve) pve01:/usr/sbin# ls *fence* fence_ack_manual fence_apc_snmp fence_cisco_mds fence_drac5 fence_hpblade fence_ilo fence_ilo_mpfence_ipmilan fence_node fence_sanbox2 fence_zvmip fence_alomfence_bladecent

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Gilberto Nunes
fence_pve?? I can't found out such fence here... Perhaps I miss some packet? Where can I found it?? 2014-12-26 14:47 GMT-02:00 Dietmar Maurer : > > > In second place, I wonder if there is such plans to include soft fence in > > Proxmox, like oVirt do... > > I think that makes not much sense, beca

Re: [pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> In second place, I wonder if there is such plans to include soft fence in > Proxmox, like oVirt do... I think that makes not much sense, because ssh also fail as soon as you have network problems. There is also the pve fenving agent (fence_pve), but this can never replace real fencing. ___

[pve-devel] Plans to Soft Fence

2014-12-26 Thread Gilberto Nunes
Hello guys... First of all, Merry Xmas for everybody In second place, I wonder if there is such plans to include soft fence in Proxmox, like oVirt do... I read something here: http://www.ovirt.org/Automatic_Fencing#Automatic_Fencing_in_oVirt_3.3 According to this wiki, it will no need of ha