> http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/18011-Proxmox-VE-3-2-
> released!?p=92037#post92037
>
> Any idea for fix?
Do you have any information about the error? What does not work? Backup log?
How to reproduce?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox
[pve-devel] KVM Live Backup performance
Eric Blevins eric at netwalk.com
Thu Dec 5 18:57:19 CET 2013
I just uploaded the qemu 1.7 package with new backup patches:
You should be able to install with:
# wget
ftp://download.proxmox.com/tmp/pve-libspice-server1_0.12.4-3_amd64.deb
# wget ftp://downlo
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:24:10 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> Oops forgot to attach the script. Here's the script I mentioned.
>
I have added this line so that my MUA can sort the mail correct:
msg += 'Date: %s \n' % time.strftime("%a, %d %b %Y %X %z")
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my pu
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:24:10 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> Oops forgot to attach the script. Here's the script I mentioned.
>
Thanks.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir datanom n
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:21:43 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> 8k for me too is much better than 4k. With 4k I tend to hit my IOPS limit
> easily, with not much throughput, and I get a lot of IO delay on VMs when
> the SAN is fairly busy. Currently I'm leaning towards 16k, sparse, with
> lz4 compressi
Oops forgot to attach the script. Here's the script I mentioned.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Chris Allen wrote:
> > I have already made some test and I have not be able to make any
> > conclusive tests proving performance should be hurt by using sparse.
>
> Yeah it shouldn't affect the Z
> I have already made some test and I have not be able to make any
> conclusive tests proving performance should be hurt by using sparse.
Yeah it shouldn't affect the ZFS mechanics at all, the ZVOL will just lack
a reservation.
> Is sparse a way to provision more than a 100% then?
Yes. That, an
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:11:17 -0700
Chris Allen wrote:
> > It was also part of latest 3.1. Double-click the mouse over your
> > storage specification in Datacenter->storage and the panel pops up.
> > Patched panel attached.
>
I forgot to mention that at the moment the code for creating ZFS
storag
> It was also part of latest 3.1. Double-click the mouse over your
> storage specification in Datacenter->storage and the panel pops up.
> Patched panel attached.
Thank you, I was unaware of this.
> BTW. Have you made any performance measures sparse vs non-sparse and
> write cache vs no write ca
>>Should we log anything else?
I'll test it this weekend, but I think it's ok like this
- Mail original -
De: "Dietmar Maurer"
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER"
Cc: "Eric Blevins" , pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 14 Mars 2014 13:21:12
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] pve-firewall: using
> >>The whole point is that I want to have local files with "easy to
> >>parse" format, so that we can view them easily and "fast" (those files can
> have many entries!).
> yes, no problem for local file
Just applied a patch to improve the log format to:
see
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve
>>Bu you should really sleep a few hours (mail sent a 3:55?)
I was doing some servers maintenance for work this night ;-)
>>Feel free to add that.
Ok, I'll check that next week. (I'm working currently on ipset)
- Mail original -
De: "Dietmar Maurer"
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" ,
>>The whole point is that I want to have local files with "easy to parse"
>>format, so that we can view them
>>easily and "fast" (those files can have many entries!).
yes, no problem for local file
>>So I would like to have code to send data direct to log servers (using syslog
>>protocol, or
> I have secret plan to integrate suricata ips at the proxmox host level.
> (I have critical vms, and customers require an ips sometime)
You are always a step ahead ;-)
Bu you should really sleep a few hours (mail sent a 3:55?)
> ips can use a lot of cpu, and be able to enable it on specific v
> can now output in json format, and then logstash or splunk can read them
> easily.
>
> code is here :
> http://git.netfilter.org/ulogd2/tree/output/ulogd_output_JSON.c?id=2b39df
> 550fbad944b4aab77617d4272c5d62ba70
>
>
> It could be wonderfull to add this kind of output format
I am quite unsur
15 matches
Mail list logo
