Hi,
I got an error message
"unable to create template, because VM contains snapshots"
on all vms I want to convert. (they are no snapshots)
sample vm config:
"
bootdisk: ide0
cores: 1
ide0: local:252/vm-252-disk-1.qcow2,size=1G
ide2: none,media=cdrom
memory: 512
name: test
net0: e1000=96:73:D
> > I am still not sure how to handle that correctly.
> >
>
> I think we must add it as unused otherwise the disk is lost... it makes more
> sense
> to maybe prevent deleting of that unused one.
I thought about introducing 'hidden' disks. But I guess it is easier to just
add them as unused, and
Am 22.04.2013 um 05:49 schrieb Dietmar Maurer :
> Ah i got it. That VM / Disk had a parent snapshot...
mhm but even than shouldn't it be listed as unused0?
>>>
>>> Yes, maybe that would be better.
>>
>> Should i send a patch? Could you point me to the direction?
>
> I am still no
> Would it be better if you use java webstart? Is that considered safer?
After reading more docs, I think webstart does not really offer any advantage
for our use case.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin
Hi Alexandre,
after the weekend, I decided to commit your first version. I also applied some
cleanups.
Please can you check it that works for you?
> -Original Message-
> From: pve-devel-boun...@pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-devel-
> boun...@pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of Alexandre Derumier
> > All people i was talking to wanted the node they're currently selected
> > to be preselected in the create wizard. They all created vms on the
> > wrong nodes ;-)
>
> In Workspace.js, we call setContent() every time the user selects someting.
>
> Maybe you can use that to store the last selec
> > The question is why you need that?
> >
>
> All people i was talking to wanted the node they're currently selected to be
> preselected in the create wizard. They all created vms on the wrong nodes ;-)
In Workspace.js, we call setContent() every time the user selects someting.
Maybe you can us
Am 22.04.2013 um 06:10 schrieb Dietmar Maurer :
>> How to get currently selected node in ExtJS?
>>
>> I tried stuff like:
>> Ext.get('PVE.tree.ResourceTree')
>> PVE.tree.ResourceTree.getSelection()[0]
>
> AFAIK there is no such functionality, because it was not needed so far.
>
> The question i
applied, thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: pve-devel-boun...@pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-devel-
> boun...@pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Priebe
> Sent: Sonntag, 21. April 2013 20:05
> To: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
> Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH] rbd -p parameter is only valid for t
> How to get currently selected node in ExtJS?
>
> I tried stuff like:
> Ext.get('PVE.tree.ResourceTree')
> PVE.tree.ResourceTree.getSelection()[0]
AFAIK there is no such functionality, because it was not needed so far.
The question is why you need that?
> >>> Ah i got it. That VM / Disk had a parent snapshot...
> >>
> >> mhm but even than shouldn't it be listed as unused0?
> >
> > Yes, maybe that would be better.
>
> Should i send a patch? Could you point me to the direction?
I am still not sure how to handle that correctly.
___
How to get currently selected node in ExtJS?
I tried stuff like:
Ext.get('PVE.tree.ResourceTree')
PVE.tree.ResourceTree.getSelection()[0]
...
but nothing works...
Stefan
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-b
Am 21.04.2013 09:21, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
Am 20.04.2013 16:15, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
Do you have a re-producible test case?
Ah i got it. That VM / Disk had a parent snapshot...
mhm but even than shouldn't it be listed as unused0?
Yes, maybe that would be better.
Should i send a pat
Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe
---
PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
index e625999..4662585 100644
--- a/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
@@ -17,6 +17,1
Would it be better if you use java webstart? Is that considered safer?
> > You miss the point. Once you accept a digitally signed applet from a
> > specific source you have forever accepted any applet signed with this
> > certificate regardless of the server sending it to you to run on your
> > co
> > Am 20.04.2013 16:15, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
> >> Do you have a re-producible test case?
> >
> > Ah i got it. That VM / Disk had a parent snapshot...
>
> mhm but even than shouldn't it be listed as unused0?
Yes, maybe that would be better.
___
pve-
> You miss the point. Once you accept a digitally signed applet from a specific
> source you have forever accepted any applet signed with this certificate
> regardless of the server sending it to you to run on your computer with full
> access. If the user also have answered yes to run this applet e
17 matches
Mail list logo
