> Esi Y via pve-devel hat am 15.01.2024 15:31 CET
> geschrieben:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:51:48PM +0100, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:51:16AM +0100, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> > > > if the target node has already stored their SSH host key on pmxcfs, pin
> > > >
with Filip's T-B, thanks!
On January 9, 2024 12:55 pm, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> by correclty passing the $force_utf8 flag to
> PVE::Tools::file_set_contents(). The idea was that only callers that
> are ready will opt-in to the behavior.
>
> When reading files with PVE::Tools::file_get_contents() or
>
On 1/15/24 17:28, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> Fallback to v.ref when we do not use an alias or ipset in order to be
> able to use normal CIDRs as source / destination address again
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich
> ---
> www/manager6/form/IPRefSelector.js | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions
Am 15/01/2024 um 16:53 schrieb Hannes Dürr:
> Tested cluster creation with three new nodes on 8.1 and the patches
> Cluster creation and further ssh communication (eq. migration) worked
> flawless
>
> Tested-by: Hannes Duerr
What about the reinstallation of an existing node, or replacing
one, w
> Thomas Lamprecht hat am 16.01.2024 11:34 CET
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Am 15/01/2024 um 16:53 schrieb Hannes Dürr:
> > Tested cluster creation with three new nodes on 8.1 and the patches
> > Cluster creation and further ssh communication (eq. migration) worked
> > flawless
> >
> > Tested-by: H
Am 16/01/2024 um 11:40 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
>
>> Thomas Lamprecht hat am 16.01.2024 11:34 CET
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> Am 15/01/2024 um 16:53 schrieb Hannes Dürr:
>>> Tested cluster creation with three new nodes on 8.1 and the patches
>>> Cluster creation and further ssh communication (
On 1/16/24 11:34, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
Am 15/01/2024 um 16:53 schrieb Hannes Dürr:
Tested cluster creation with three new nodes on 8.1 and the patches
Cluster creation and further ssh communication (eq. migration) worked
flawless
Tested-by: Hannes Duerr
What about the reinstallation of an
Am 04.10.23 um 09:35 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> It's not clear to users what this property does otherwise. Latest
> report from the community forum:
>
> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/134393
>
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner
Ping
___
pve-devel mailing l
Am 10.10.23 um 10:57 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> Otherwise, a VM in those states would be terminated after a backup
> in handle_qmp_return() with QMP 'quit', which is pretty bad in case
> of the 'suspended' state.
>
> Does not change the fact that a VM started in prelaunch mode for
> backup is terminat
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler
---
pvecm.adoc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pvecm.adoc b/pvecm.adoc
index 14556c2..48d86bc 100644
--- a/pvecm.adoc
+++ b/pvecm.adoc
@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ hostnames, ensure that they are resolvable from all nodes
(see also
xre
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler
---
qm.adoc | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qm.adoc b/qm.adoc
index fa6a772..c2392f3 100644
--- a/qm.adoc
+++ b/qm.adoc
@@ -689,8 +689,7 @@ database VM when spare RAM is available. For this you
assign a Shares property
of 30
* precise statements
* increase compactness w/o complexity
* improve section-formatting
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler
---
qm.adoc | 40 +---
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qm.adoc b/qm.adoc
index c2392f3..268a635 100644
---
* restructure sentences minimally
* improve section-formatting
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler
---
qm.adoc | 22 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qm.adoc b/qm.adoc
index 268a635..15aa0fc 100644
--- a/qm.adoc
+++ b/qm.adoc
@@ -364,17 +364,21 @
* mention side effects
* increase compactness w/o complexity
* improve section-formatting
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler
---
qm.adoc | 32 ++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qm.adoc b/qm.adoc
index 15aa0fc..d92db75 100644
--- a/qm.a
I don't think this is an improvement of the wording, liked the previous
version more.
Are there people who have not understood the wording?
On 1/16/24 14:11, Alexander Zeidler wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler
---
qm.adoc | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:28 +0100, Hannes Dürr wrote:
> I don't think this is an improvement of the wording, liked the previous
> version more.
> Are there people who have not understood the wording?
It's not an extra (additional) amount of memory for this VM, but its
total. Therefore, using the w
--- Begin Message ---
Thank you for the responses below, I just want to explain all the fuss in my
reasoning, i.e. why I am bringing it up before this goes into a release.
The original way of handling SSH was meant to be pretty transparent to the user:
A. If they ran plain ssh, without any extra
>>Is the QEMU error message understandable? If yes, I don't see much
>>value
Well, indeed, the message is pretty clear.
maybe just add documentation about limit for q35 && i440fx ?
(I have a customer with a new epyc v4, asking me about this, and I had
no idea that they was a different limit betw
With the current implementation using queryDelay, this means that the
change event for the input never completes. This in turn leads to
the input panel never changing its dirty status. By using the
beforequery event we can simply cancel the query without resorting to
the queryDelay hack.
Reported-
fall back to using v.ref as value when we do not have an alias or ipset
since scope and name are not set for ips / cidrs
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich
---
Changes from v1:
* Added fix for an additional bug causing changes to IPs not being
picked up by the input panel
www/manager6/form/IPRef
On 1/16/24 11:33, Mira Limbeck wrote:
> This removes the error reported in the bug tracker, but new changes to
> the IP are not recognized.
> E.g.:
> original IP range: 10.0.0.0/8
> new IP range: 192.168.0.0/24
>
> The `ok` button is still disabled unless you change anything else,
> change to a
This patch series adds the option to set a custom directory for ACME and
enables the user to use external account binding, which is required by
some providers.
Folke Gleumes (2):
fix #5093: webui: acme: custom directory option
webui: acme: add eab fields
www/manager6/node/ACME.js | 168 +
This patch allows the user to set a custom ACME directory by providing
a 'Custom' option in the directory dropdown. This in turn reveals an
input for the url. When using a custom directory the directory has to
be manually queried via button press to prevent from spamming the
directory on every inpu
Adds fields for eab credentials. By default eab is optional, but if the
directory should report that eab is required, the eab credential fields
are marked as mandatory and prevent the form from being submittable
until credentials are provided.
Signed-off-by: Folke Gleumes
---
www/manager6/node/A
For testing, I have used pebble [0] in a separate lxc container.
1. Download and compile the project
2. Start pebble with the included eab config:
pebble -c test/config/pebble-config-external-account-bindings.json
3. Import the certificates from the test/certs folder into the pve
instance
4. Add t
On 1/16/24 15:30, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> fall back to using v.ref as value when we do not have an alias or ipset
> since scope and name are not set for ips / cidrs
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich
> ---
>
> Changes from v1:
> * Added fix for an additional bug causing changes to IPs not being
On 1/16/24 15:30, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> With the current implementation using queryDelay, this means that the
> change event for the input never completes. This in turn leads to
> the input panel never changing its dirty status. By using the
> beforequery event we can simply cancel the query wit
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler
---
qm.adoc | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qm.adoc b/qm.adoc
index 4ff5014..86762d3 100644
--- a/qm.adoc
+++ b/qm.adoc
@@ -698,9 +698,9 @@ database blocks in the database server RAM, you would like
to prioritize the
dat
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:36 +0100, Alexander Zeidler wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:28 +0100, Hannes Dürr wrote:
> > I don't think this is an improvement of the wording, liked the previous
> > version more.
> > Are there people who have not understood the wording?
> It's not an extra (additiona
Am 16.01.24 um 15:08 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre:
>
>>> Is the QEMU error message understandable? If yes, I don't see much
>>> value
>
> Well, indeed, the message is pretty clear.
> maybe just add documentation about limit for q35 && i440fx ?
>
> (I have a customer with a new epyc v4, asking me
30 matches
Mail list logo
