On 12/20/21 20:55, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
On 20/12/2021 14:57, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer
how did you test this if the noVNC patch from Dominik is broken?
Tested the "open in full screen" part of it all, which works with or without
the noVNC patches. Meaning, whil
On 21/12/2021 08:05, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> On 12/20/21 20:53, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> On 20/12/2021 12:33, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>>> patch 15 hides the fullscreen button,
>>> patch 16 make the error message dismissable
>>>
>>
>> this seems broken?
>>
>> The d/patches/series file gets 16 and 17
On 12/20/21 20:21, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
On 20/12/2021 16:38, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
The new splash screen that came with Android 12 has stricter rules
regarding the size and form of the logo in the splash screen [0].
We do need to have a drawable that is a square with the logo / icon in
th
On 12/20/21 20:37, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
On 20/12/2021 16:38, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
The new splash screen that came with Android 12 has stricter rules
regarding the size and form of the logo in the splash screen [0].
oh, do you have an actual reference to the strict rules you found, as [0
On 21/12/2021 10:27, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> On 12/20/21 20:37, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> On 20/12/2021 16:38, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
>>> The new splash screen that came with Android 12 has stricter rules
>>> regarding the size and form of the logo in the splash screen [0].
>>
>> oh, do you have an
On 17/12/2021 11:19, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> we just have to bump again if we want to
>
> Dominik Csapak (4):
> upgrade novnc to 1.3.0
> rebase patches for 1.3.0
> add patch for proper hiding of buttons
> use esbuild instead of node-es6-module-transpiler
>
> debian/control
On 20/12/2021 12:33, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> patch 15 hides the fullscreen button,
> patch 16 make the error message dismissable
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak
> ---
> ...-button-on-isFullscreen-get-variable.patch | 39 +++
> debian/patches/0017-make-error-hideable.patch | 47
On 20/12/2021 13:43, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> in get_credentials, we try to read the token for the specified server,
> and warn if we cannot do that (e.g. because the file does not exist)
>
> since having no token is a valid configuration, suppress that warning on
> connection.
>
> reported by a f
On 20/12/2021 15:03, Mira Limbeck wrote:
> With the patch adding vendor-data support to cloud-init, a use of
> uninitialized value was introduced. This can be fixed by setting it to
> an empty string if no vendor-data is defined.
>
> vendor-data can only be set via --cicustom and is optional.
>
>
On 20/12/2021 11:31, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> what do we gain by having a limit on the number of protected backups?
We avoid allowing users to create an infinite number of backups.
Remember that unprotected backups do not count towards the keep-X retention
parameters as they are considered a speci
Hi,
this is a proof of concept to implement ressource aware HA.
The current implementation is really basic,
simply balancing the number of services on each node.
I had some real production cases, where a node is failing, and restarted vm
impact others nodes because of too much cpu/ram usage.
C
his new implementation use best-fit heuristic vector packing with constraints
support.
- We compute nodes memory/cpu, and vm memory/cpu average stats on last 20min
For each ressource :
- First, we ordering pending recovery state services by memory, then cpu usage.
Memory is more important her
---
src/test/test-basic0/README | 1 +
src/test/test-basic0/cmdlist | 4 +++
src/test/test-basic0/hardware_status | 5 +++
src/test/test-basic0/log.expect | 52
src/test/test-basic0/manager_status | 1 +
src/test/test-basic0/node_stats |
The new Android 12 splash screen will mask the logo / icon. See figure 2
in [0]. This resulted in the current logo being cut off by the circular
mask, appearing broken.
I created a new version, based on the stacked variant accounting for the
additional space around the logo needed for the mask. It
On 12/21/21 16:11, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
On 20/12/2021 11:31, Dominik Csapak wrote:
what do we gain by having a limit on the number of protected backups?
We avoid allowing users to create an infinite number of backups.
Remember that unprotected backups do not count towards the keep-X retent
15 matches
Mail list logo
