> Andrei Perapiolkin hat am 28.05.2025 16:49
> CEST geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Fabian,
>
> Thank you for your time dedicated to this issue.
>
> >> My current understanding is that all assets related to snapshots should
> >> to be removed when volume is deactivation, is it correct?
> >> Or all v
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Fabian,
Thank you for your time dedicated to this issue.
My current understanding is that all assets related to snapshots should
to be removed when volume is deactivation, is it correct?
Or all volumes and snapshots expected to be present across the entire
cluster unti
> Andrei Perapiolkin hat am 27.05.2025 18:08
> CEST geschrieben:
>
>
> > 3. In the context of live migration: Will Proxmox skip calling
> > /deactivate_volume/ for snapshots that have already been activated?
> > Should the storage plugin explicitly deactivate all snapshots of a
> > volume dur
--- Begin Message ---
3. In the context of live migration: Will Proxmox skip calling
/deactivate_volume/ for snapshots that have already been activated?
Should the storage plugin explicitly deactivate all snapshots of a
volume during migration?
a live migration is not concerned with snapshots o
> Andrei Perapiolkin via pve-devel hat am
> 26.05.2025 16:31 CEST geschrieben:
> Hi Proxmox Community,
>
> I'm curious whether there are any standard or guidelines that govern the
> order in which the methods: /activate_volume, deactivate_volume, path/
> are called during VM live migration.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Proxmox Community,
I'm curious whether there are any standard or guidelines that govern the
order in which the methods: /activate_volume, deactivate_volume, path/
are called during VM live migration.
Assuming the storage plugin supports `live migration`:
1. Can/path/
