Am 09/09/2024 um 09:52 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> Am 09.09.24 um 09:48 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
>> given that I also use `apt upgrade` from time to time (habit from being an
>> unstable user ;)), and that it might alienate power users coming from
>> Debian, I'd prefer this to be a non-interactive
Am 09.09.24 um 09:48 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
>> Thomas Lamprecht hat am 06.09.2024 18:58 CEST
>> geschrieben:
>> Am 06/09/2024 um 12:40 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
>>> Many people will use 'upgrade' instead of 'full-upgrade' or
>>> 'dist-upgrade' (e.g. [0][1]) despite the documentation explicitly
> Thomas Lamprecht hat am 06.09.2024 18:58 CEST
> geschrieben:
> Am 06/09/2024 um 12:40 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> > Many people will use 'upgrade' instead of 'full-upgrade' or
> > 'dist-upgrade' (e.g. [0][1]) despite the documentation explicitly
> > mentioning 'dist-upgrade' [3]. Proxmox VE uses d
Am 06/09/2024 um 12:40 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> Many people will use 'upgrade' instead of 'full-upgrade' or
> 'dist-upgrade' (e.g. [0][1]) despite the documentation explicitly
> mentioning 'dist-upgrade' [3]. Proxmox VE uses different packaging
> guarantees than Debian and using 'upgrade' can lead to
Am 06/09/2024 um 14:16 schrieb Alexander Zeidler:
> On Fri Sep 6, 2024 at 12:40 PM CEST, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> (DPkg::Pre-Invoke is also too late). Since this is just an additional
>> safety warning to guide new users, it should still be good enough.
>
>> + if ($line && $line =~ m/^CommandLine::A
Am 06/09/2024 um 13:01 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> just to mention it (i think it's not widely known):
>
> 'apt upgrade' behaves slightly different than 'apt-get upgrade'
>
> while the former also installs new packages if necessary, the latter
> doesn't, so an 'apt upgrade' will maybe work ok in mo
On Fri Sep 6, 2024 at 12:40 PM CEST, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> (DPkg::Pre-Invoke is also too late). Since this is just an additional
> safety warning to guide new users, it should still be good enough.
> + if ($line && $line =~ m/^CommandLine::AsString=apt(-get)?%20upgrade$/) {
> +$log->("!! WARNI
just to mention it (i think it's not widely known):
'apt upgrade' behaves slightly different than 'apt-get upgrade'
while the former also installs new packages if necessary, the latter
doesn't, so an 'apt upgrade' will maybe work ok in most sitations.
I guess we want to filter it out nonetheless
Sorry, messed up the subject-prefix, since I copy-pasted it in the
.git/config and forgot to change. This is for proxmox-ve of course.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
Many people will use 'upgrade' instead of 'full-upgrade' or
'dist-upgrade' (e.g. [0][1]) despite the documentation explicitly
mentioning 'dist-upgrade' [3]. Proxmox VE uses different packaging
guarantees than Debian and using 'upgrade' can lead to a broken
system [2].
The match is kept simple, to
10 matches
Mail list logo
