Am 25.01.24 um 19:18 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
Stupid question: Wouldn't It be much easier to add a simple IO-buffer
with limited capacity, implemented inside the RUST backup code?
>>
>> At work, we are running a backup cluster on remote location with hdd ,
>> and a production cluster with
> >>Stupid question: Wouldn't It be much easier to add a simple IO-buffer
> >>with limited capacity, implemented inside the RUST backup code?
>
> At work, we are running a backup cluster on remote location with hdd ,
> and a production cluster with super fast nvme,
> and sometimes I have really b
Hi Dietmar !
>>Stupid question: Wouldn't It be much easier to add a simple IO-buffer
>>with limited capacity, implemented inside the RUST backup code?
At work, we are running a backup cluster on remote location with hdd ,
and a production cluster with super fast nvme,
and sometimes I have really
Stupid question: Wouldn't It be much easier to add a simple IO-buffer
with limited capacity, implemented inside the RUST backup code?
> +WARNING: Theoretically, the fleecing image can grow to the same size as the
> +original image, e.g. if the guest re-writes a whole disk while the backup is
> +b
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner
---
vzdump.adoc | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/vzdump.adoc b/vzdump.adoc
index 24a3e80..eb67141 100644
--- a/vzdump.adoc
+++ b/vzdump.adoc
@@ -136,6 +136,34 @@ not included in backups. For volume mount points you can
s
