Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu v2 07/21] PVE backup: add fleecing option

2024-04-10 Thread Wolfgang Bumiller
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:30:59AM +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Am 08.04.24 um 14:45 schrieb Wolfgang Bumiller: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:24:48AM +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote: > >> @@ -581,6 +682,14 @@ static void create_backup_jobs_bh(void *opaque) { > >> aio_co_enter(data->ctx, data->co); >

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu v2 07/21] PVE backup: add fleecing option

2024-04-10 Thread Fiona Ebner
Am 08.04.24 um 14:45 schrieb Wolfgang Bumiller: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:24:48AM +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote: >> @@ -581,6 +682,14 @@ static void create_backup_jobs_bh(void *opaque) { >> aio_co_enter(data->ctx, data->co); >> } >> >> +/* >> + * EFI disk and TPM state are small and it's just

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu v2 07/21] PVE backup: add fleecing option

2024-04-08 Thread Wolfgang Bumiller
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:24:48AM +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote: > When a fleecing option is given, it is expected that each device has > a corresponding "-fleecing" block device already attached, except for > EFI disk and TPM state, where fleecing is never used. > > The following graph was adapted fr

[pve-devel] [PATCH qemu v2 07/21] PVE backup: add fleecing option

2024-03-15 Thread Fiona Ebner
When a fleecing option is given, it is expected that each device has a corresponding "-fleecing" block device already attached, except for EFI disk and TPM state, where fleecing is never used. The following graph was adapted from [0] which also contains more details about fleecing. [guest] |