Sent a v1:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250528164630.2204379-1-a.laute...@proxmox.com/T/#t
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
By printing the site and component, the person installing it manuall has
a final check to see if the correct repository is being used.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer
---
Notes:
I intially tried to get the repo definition similar to how it is in the
.list file and printed by apt-cache poli
by adding a 4th repository option called 'offline'. If set, the ceph
installation step will not touch the repository configuration.
We add a simple version check to make sure that the latest version
available (and to be installed) does match the selected major Ceph
version.
Signed-off-by: Aaron L
The new 'offline' repository option will not try to configure the Ceph
repositories during installation.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer
Tested-by: Christoph Heiss
---
Notes:
changes since RFC:
* renamed option from 'offline' to 'manual' and therefore adapted the
dropdown name
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Proxmox Community,
I am working on implementing custom storage plugin and after evaluating
various edge cases related to volume live migration, I have decided to
create a 'storage assistant service'.
This service will be responsible for managing my storage plugin volume
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Fabian,
Thank you for your time dedicated to this issue.
My current understanding is that all assets related to snapshots should
to be removed when volume is deactivation, is it correct?
Or all volumes and snapshots expected to be present across the entire
cluster unti
--- Begin Message ---
Message initial
De: Fiona Ebner
À: Proxmox VE development discussion ,
f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com
Cc: "DERUMIER, Alexandre"
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 13/14] blockdev: add
backing_chain support
Date: 28/05/2025 12:07:14
Am 28.05.25 um 11:08
Tested the following things and they worked:
* Create a new simple zone with Nautobot IPAM
* Create a VNet with a Subnet + GW -> IP allocated
* Create a VM on that VNet -> IP allocated
* Create a CT on that VNet -> IP allocated
* Change network device to another bridge -> IP deleted
* Change back
The word "sites" is a little bit inaccurate in this instance.
"Hosts", on the other hnad more accurately describes any
PVE machines users may have.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Abraham
---
lib/pages/main_layout_slim.dart | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/pages/m
Changed the "Available Sites" text inside the added PVE
hosts view to "Available Hosts" because "Sites" is a bit
odd.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Abraham
---
lib/proxmox_login_selector.dart | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/proxmox_login_selector.dart b/lib/pro
Applied, thanks! I changed the path/pool to not re-use existing ones for
different storages, just for future-proofing/more realism.
[1/1] tests: qemu_img_convert: add rbd and btrfs snapshots convert test
commit: 1fd1ca60f94c68702a6ebda1000e0e9d5fc7f50f
_
Ping, still applies.
On Wed Apr 23, 2025 at 12:45 PM CEST, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> Going by the changelog, there seem to be no actual breaking changes,
> except one commit - which is reverted w/ patch #4, due to being broken.
>
> Other than that, it's just bug fixes and new attributes. I also ski
Am 28.05.25 um 11:08 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre via pve-devel:
> perl question: how to call a resursive private sub ? (it don't seem to
> allow it)
AFAIK, you can do it by declaring it up-front:
> [I] root@pve8a1 ~# cat asdf.pm
> use strict;
> use warnings;
>
> package Private;
>
> my sub add
Please use present tense in the commit title/subject like is customary
in Proxmox VE development.
Am 27.05.25 um 14:39 schrieb Alexander Abraham:
> The section about "Creating SWAP partitions" lives in its own
> file and the warning about creating SWAP partitions on ZFS was
> moved back to the ori
Now that there is a dedicated section for configuring tags, link to that
instead of to the documentation of the datacenter configuration file.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss
---
www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js | 2 +-
www/manager6/dc/RegisteredTagsEdit.js | 2 +-
www/manager6/dc/UserTagAcc
This section is available since pve-docs 8.2.4, released November 2024.
Includes the necessary bump to accommodate that.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss
---
Hopefully the bump is okay as-is, but feel free to adjust as needed.
debian/control | 2 +-
www/manager6/panel/TagConfig.j
This section has been available since pve-docs 6.0-5, which was released
in October 2019.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss
---
www/manager6/qemu/AudioEdit.js | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/AudioEdit.js b/www/manager6/qemu/AudioEdit.js
index
Came across these commented-out `onlineHelp` and looked into it - all
referenced sections across the repo have been (very) long available in
pve-docs and can thus be enabled.
Additionally, after looking at #3, thought to link to this "new" section
in some other tags-related panels, instead of the
This section is available since pve-docs 7.1-1, which was released in
November 2021.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss
---
www/manager6/qemu/HDTPM.js | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/HDTPM.js b/www/manager6/qemu/HDTPM.js
index 87349aedb..dac3bb5e
--- Begin Message ---
>
>
> +sub generate_backing_blockdev {
>>make this private?
perl question: how to call a resursive private sub ? (it don't seem to
allow it)
> + my ($storecfg, $snapshots, $deviceid, $drive, $snap_id) = @_;
> +
> + my $snapshot = $snapshots->{$snap_id};
> + my
Obsolete due to:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250522161731.537011-1-s.hanre...@proxmox.com/
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
As reported in the community forum [0], it was not possible to use the
extended schema that supports disk allocation with 'import-from' for
'qm import'. Align it more closely to the VM creation endpoint.
[0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/166734/
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner
---
Better viewed
> Andrei Perapiolkin hat am 27.05.2025 18:08
> CEST geschrieben:
>
>
> > 3. In the context of live migration: Will Proxmox skip calling
> > /deactivate_volume/ for snapshots that have already been activated?
> > Should the storage plugin explicitly deactivate all snapshots of a
> > volume dur
23 matches
Mail list logo
