The patch seems to indeed improve the performance of BLKZEROOUT and
other operations that use write_zeroes for both drives.
Tested with LVM-thick LVs on both drives, as LVM seems to pass-through the
write_zeroes_max_bytes property (going by the output of:
/sys/block/nvmeXn1/queue/write_zeroes_max_
As reported in the community forum [0][1], QEMU processes for Linux
guests would consume more CPU on the host after an update to QEMU 9.2.
The issue was reproduced and bisecting pointed to QEMU commit
f0ccf77078 ("hpet: fix and cleanup persistence of interrupt status").
Some quick experimentation
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 7:12 AM Fabian Grünbichler
wrote:
>
> On March 6, 2025 4:20 pm, Mira Limbeck wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/25 06:42, Thomas Skinner wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Skinner
> >> ---
> >> src/PVE/API2/OpenId.pm | 6 +-
> >> src/PVE/Auth/OpenId.pm | 7 +++
> >> 2 files
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:34 AM Mira Limbeck wrote:
>
> On 3/17/25 13:18, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> > On February 13, 2025 12:03 pm, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mira Limbeck hat am 12.02.2025 15:51 CET
> >>> geschrieben:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2/11/25 06:40, Thomas Skinner wrote:
>
On Tue Mar 4, 2025 at 11:49 AM CET, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote:
> Whenever a filesystem is selected we show the size selection stack page.
>
> At the moment entering any raid setup, then entering the Advanced
> Options page and then selecting any non-raid setup will show the
> raiddisk page since i
--- Begin Message ---
Hannes,
I appreciate the swift review. I talked with my colleague in Cc and there's no
issue with being co-authors. So let's go forward with your proposition. Thank
you for taking care of it!
Best regards
De : Hannes Dürr
Envoyé : me
--- Begin Message ---
Re,
Ok so. Answering on that.
By default, the status "Active" already exists for fresh installs. However,
since the users are free to define whatever status they want (and delete the
pre-existing ones!), I thought it'd be best if we checked it did exist first.
There could be
On 18.03.2025 11:48, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
based on the rest of the discussion, this will be rebased on top of the
builder from
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250218161311.558674-2-g.gol...@proxmox.com/
?
yep
___
pve-devel mailing list
p
Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
> Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
>
>> Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
>>
>>> Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
>>>
Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
> Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
>
>> The catalog-{lang}.mo files are generated only with strings that are
On 3/6/25 12:08, lou.lecriv...@orange.fr wrote:
[...]
+sub verify_api {
+my ($class, $plugin_config) = @_;
+
+my $url = $plugin_config->{url};
+my $namespace = $plugin_config->{namespace};
+my $headers = default_headers($plugin_config);
+
+# check that the namespace exists
In general the plugin implementation seems sensible, the only thing I
didn't quite understand is the need for `get_status_ip`, more on that
inline.
The series no longer applies to master, as there have been patches that
add a fingerprint parameter to the API request [0].
For testing purposes I
On 3/19/25 09:58, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote:
At the moment, the color of the preview tag won't match the final tag
once it is added if the tag contained uppercase letters. With this patch
the color in the tag being created will match the color of the final tag
added to a guest.
Signed-off-by: M
On 3/18/25 12:30, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
This would be really interesting for applying the SDN configuration as
well, where I'm currently calling the existing bulk-call. Really like
the design with the start / check callbacks, that should make this quite
flexible.
On 3/18/25 11:39, Dominik Csapa
At the moment, the color of the preview tag won't match the final tag
once it is added if the tag contained uppercase letters. With this patch
the color in the tag being created will match the color of the final tag
added to a guest.
Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval
---
www/manager6/form/Tag.
On 3/19/25 09:50, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> On Tue Mar 18, 2025 at 4:38 PM CET, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
>> Add LDAP_UDP macro to the firewall to support LDAP implementations
>> that use UDP as well, such as Windows AD [1]
>>
>> [1]
>> https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/troubleshoot/windows-server/
Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
> Splitting the strings adds extra work to translators as they now have
> less context to work with.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval
ping.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.pr
On Tue Mar 18, 2025 at 4:38 PM CET, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> Add LDAP_UDP macro to the firewall to support LDAP implementations
> that use UDP as well, such as Windows AD [1]
>
> [1]
> https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/troubleshoot/windows-server/active-directory/config-firewall-for-ad-domains-and
Maximiliano Sandoval writes:
> Whenever a filesystem is selected we show the size selection stack page.
>
> At the moment entering any raid setup, then entering the Advanced
> Options page and then selecting any non-raid setup will show the
> raiddisk page since it is still the visible child.
>
thanks
On March 10, 2025 11:22 am, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote:
> With rust 2024 edition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval
> ---
> src/main.rs | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/main.rs b/src/main.rs
> index 4662ffa..795b0f2 100644
> --- a/src/ma
19 matches
Mail list logo
