Le 26/07/22 à 08:55, Dominik Csapak a écrit :
> This series improves the handling of NVIDIA vGPUs by exposing the optional
> name
> and automatically adding the uuid to the qemu process (required by NVIDIA
> driver). Also adds the name to the UI for selecting a mediated devices as well
> as ma
many thanks for this patch series.
I had a student at the previous training needing this feature.
I'll be usefull in the future to get mdev vgpu live migration (It's not
yet working with qemu 6.2)
I'll try to test it next week when I'll back from holiday.
Le 19/07/22 à 13:46, Dominik Csapak
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer
---
src/repositories/mod.rs | 2 ++
src/repositories/standard.rs | 29 +
tests/repositories.rs| 2 ++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/repositories/mod.rs b/src/repositories/mod.rs
index 88b515d..d8848b8 1
by extracting the actual schema used in the validator into a varaible,
and dumping the contained item properties into the verbose_description
of the string API type we at least get a full description in the api
viewer.
On July 27, 2022 4:56 pm, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> this also makes it more expl
thanks!
On July 27, 2022 4:56 pm, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> since this was missing a proper return type definition the api viewer
> couldn't display the endpoint (`retinfs.items` was undefined). also
> the `pvesh` command would complain that it cannot properly format the
> return type because the vari
Am 02.08.22 um 11:52 schrieb Mira Limbeck:
> On 7/26/22 14:25, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> Reported in the community forum[0].
>>
>> For 6.1.0, there were a few changes to the coroutine-sleep API, but
>> the adaptations in f376b2b ("update and rebase to QEMU v6.1.0") made
>> a mistake.
>>
>> Currently, t
On 7/26/22 14:25, Fiona Ebner wrote:
Reported in the community forum[0].
For 6.1.0, there were a few changes to the coroutine-sleep API, but
the adaptations in f376b2b ("update and rebase to QEMU v6.1.0") made
a mistake.
Currently, target_close_wait is NULL when passed to
qemu_co_sleep_ns_wakea
including RFC patch, which looked sensible to me ;)
thanks!
On July 27, 2022 1:22 pm, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Am 13.06.22 um 12:29 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
>> In certain scenarios, see manager 2/2 and guest-common 3/4, replicated
>> volumes could end up orphaned. This series attempts to fix those, as
>
Am 01.08.22 um 16:30 schrieb Stefan Hrdlicka:
> Hello :)
>
> On 7/27/22 12:19, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> Am 19.07.22 um 13:57 schrieb Stefan Hrdlicka:
>>> @@ -42,7 +45,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.storage.IScsiScan', {
>>> fields: ['target', 'portal'],
>>> proxy: {
>>> type: 'pro
