On 4/11/22 14:17, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
[...]
Some more (smaller) changes might be necessary, if the implementation we
manage to upstream will be a bit different. But that should not be much of an
issue AFAICT.
We can always ship our downstream solution to be whatever we want and sync up
o
--- Begin Message ---
Can someone please take a look at this patch? It's a minor change that will
allow proxmox to set hostname on NixOS LXCs.
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 15:51, Harikrishnan R
wrote:
> While NixOS generally overrides any static contents in /etc/hostname
> with the hostname defined in
On 11.04.22 11:08, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> On 4/11/22 09:39, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> The obvious question to me is: why bother with this workaround when we can
>> make udev create the symlink now already?
>>
>> Patching the rules file and/or binary shipped by ceph-common, or shipping our
>> own
For VMs, the plan is to allow passing along disk options (with the
currently configured disks) for a restore operation to cause those
disks to be kept instead of removing and restoring them from backup.
Users might expect the same behavior for containers once that feature
exists, but implementing i
On 05.04.22 14:30, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> Aaron Lauterer (5):
> ui: utils: refactor mps to mp
> ui: utils: add nextFreeMP
> ui: lxc/qemu: add disk reassign and action submenu
> ui: BusTypeSelector: change noVirtIO to withVirtIO
> ui: hdmove: modernize/refactor
>
> www/manager6/Makefile
On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 11:03 +0200, Matthias Heiserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please take a look at our developer documentation.
> https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation
>
> Using `git format-patch` makes applying the changes a whole lot
> easier :)
>
> As far as I can tell from a quick te
On 4/11/22 09:39, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
On 08.04.22 10:04, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
On April 6, 2022 1:46 pm, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
If two RBD storages use the same pool, but connect to different
clusters, we cannot say to which cluster the mapped RBD image belongs to
if krbd is used. To a
Hi,
please take a look at our developer documentation.
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation
Using `git format-patch` makes applying the changes a whole lot easier :)
As far as I can tell from a quick test, your changes seem to work.
Would you mind using `pvesh create` to test?
On 08.04.22 10:04, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On April 6, 2022 1:46 pm, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
>> If two RBD storages use the same pool, but connect to different
>> clusters, we cannot say to which cluster the mapped RBD image belongs to
>> if krbd is used. To avoid potential data loss, we need to
If TFA was added and disabled afterwards it was not possible to login
again.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer
---
This was reported on the forum.
src/PVE/API2/AccessControl.pm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/AccessControl.pm b/src/PVE/API2/Access
10 matches
Mail list logo
