Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH kernel] Backport two io-wq fixes relevant for io_uring

2022-03-08 Thread Fabian Ebner
Am 08.03.22 um 17:19 schrieb Mark Schouten: > Hi, > > So should I try and find someone who is able to reproduce this with a > test-machine and is able to give you remote access to debug? Would that help? > It would certainly increase the likelihood of finding the issue. Since it only happens on

Re: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH storage] Plugins: en/decode notes as UTF-8

2022-03-08 Thread Dominik Csapak
On 3/8/22 19:10, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: On 08.03.22 15:41, Dominik Csapak wrote: When writing into the file, explicitly utf8 encode it, and then try to utf8 decode it on read. If the notes are not valid utf8, we assume it was an iso-8859 comment and return is at is was. Technically this is a

Re: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH storage] Plugins: en/decode notes as UTF-8

2022-03-08 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 08.03.22 15:41, Dominik Csapak wrote: > When writing into the file, explicitly utf8 encode it, and then try to > utf8 decode it on read. > > If the notes are not valid utf8, we assume it was an iso-8859 comment > and return is at is was. > > Technically this is a breaking change, since there a

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH kernel] Backport two io-wq fixes relevant for io_uring

2022-03-08 Thread Mark Schouten via pve-devel
--- Begin Message --- Hi, So should I try and find someone who is able to reproduce this with a test-machine and is able to give you remote access to debug? Would that help? — Mark Schouten, CTO Tuxis B.V. m...@tuxis.nl > On 8 Mar 2022, at 10:12, Fabian Ebner wrote: > > Am 07.03.22 um 15:5

[pve-devel] [RFC PATCH storage] Plugins: en/decode notes as UTF-8

2022-03-08 Thread Dominik Csapak
When writing into the file, explicitly utf8 encode it, and then try to utf8 decode it on read. If the notes are not valid utf8, we assume it was an iso-8859 comment and return is at is was. Technically this is a breaking change, since there are iso-8859 comments that would sucessfully decode as u

[pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu-server] api: vm_start: 'force-cpu' is for internal migration use only

2022-03-08 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 07.03.22 14:20, Oguz Bektas wrote: > 'force-cpu' parameter was introduced to allow live-migration of VMs with > custom CPU models; it does not need to be allowed for general use on > vm_start for regular users, since they would be able to set arbitrary > cpu types or cpuid parameters that aren't

[pve-devel] [PATCH ja.po 1/1] new Japanese message catalog

2022-03-08 Thread User Ribbon
update ja.po for proxmox-ve 7.1-10 --- --- /tmp/ja.po 2022-03-08 18:19:34.0 +0900 +++ jan.po 2022-03-07 11:04:44.763767160 +0900 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Project-Id-Version: proxmox translations\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-T

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH kernel] Backport two io-wq fixes relevant for io_uring

2022-03-08 Thread Fabian Ebner
Am 07.03.22 um 15:51 schrieb Mark Schouten: > Hi, > > Sorry for getting back on this thread after a few months, but is the > Windows-case mentioned here the case that is discussed in this forum-thread: > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/windows-vms-stuck-on-boot-after-proxmox-upgrade-to-7-0.1007