uot;iptables-save > /etc/iptables.rules",
refreshonly => true,
}
But I don't see that exec being called. Nor do I see any attempts at
calling it. (I've even been testing with the command set to "false")
Anyone know what's up with this, or have another sug
e may vary.
I found a couple problems on my ubuntu machines. I forked it to
http://github.com/directionless/puppet-iptables I think you probably
want to pull some of my patches up, I sent you a thing through github.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
t isn't supported you can always do nothing by default. Of
> course some users may not want persistence and would want to turn it
> off ...
I feel ambivalent. Given the lack of standards here I suspect there may
be some site specific customizations. Which I'd rather expose in pupp
t recent thing I've seen in this
space. I'm not sure how far along they are.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubsc
an/sudoers.html#including_other_files_from_within_sudoers
FWIW I love this feature. My puppet sudo module uses it to allow other
modules to insert sudo stanzas. Much simpler to let them each manage
their own sudo snippet, than to get concat file working.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
lly pretty
easy. Puppet, for example is 3 commands:
git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-puppet/Puppet.git
cd puppet
git-buildpackage --git-upstream-branch=origin/upstream -us -uc
Have fun.
seph
hai wu writes:
> Dependency would not work, I chose to install another ubuntu 10.04 and wil
laces, or just enter
them.
Then spammers discovered the internet, and everything got harder. Now
there are lots of hoops I need to jump through to ask questions, submit
bugs, whatever. The higher barrier tends to push me to not bothering for
most things.
seph
--
You received this message becaus
d/ping-$fqdn.cfg",
}
}
I see a couple of threads from last year about this, but no really
satisfying conclusions. It sounds like most people end up adding a
dependency which causes everything to purge and then be recreated
anew. Which feels like a lot of churn.
Do folks have a nice solution f
FWIW When I hit this awhile ago I opened a bug
(http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3720). Annoying, it was
rejected.
seph
Tore writes:
> I just realized that this wont work, since the variable allready is
> defined. The variable must also be defined before the include, since
> it i
Oh, this is 0.25.4
seph
seph writes:
> I'm trying to use puppet to manage a directory full of files. Files are
> each a collected resource. In my case, they're part of nagios. But I
> can't really get it to work. The purge on the directory doesn't take
> into
t, earlier versions installed to /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/facter
I'll probably just downgrade my facter, but this seems like an issue.
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To
Sure. #536137
Nigel Kersten writes:
> seph, please bug report this on debian and we'll sort it out.
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:00 AM, seph wrote:
>>
>> I'm running ubuntu LTS, and just installed puppet and facter by pulling
>> the latest unstable
e released versions.
seph
Chris Blumentritt writes:
> I have run into this problem today trying to stand up some new servers.
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Andrew Shafer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Scott,
>>
>> Can you pastie the simplest code to reproduce an
user=> "root",
require => Package["anacron"],
}
r...@puppet-test:~# puppet /var/tmp/puppet-cron.pp
sh: Syntax error: Bad fd number
sh: Syntax error: Bad fd number
err: Could not create puppet cron test: Could not find a defaul
the package doesn't
exist, or isn't defined.
seph
Teyo Tyree writes:
> Delivered from mobile device.
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:35 AM, seph wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to use puppet
not create puppet cron test: Could not find a default
provider for cron
Could not find a default provider for cron
seph
Joe McDonagh writes:
> You need to require both the package and service in all your cron
> resources. So, best thing
I'm running on ubuntu. Anyhow, I'm running puppet with only that
file. Nothing more. So if it needs an explicit service definition, it
should complain about it. Anyhow I tried it, same error. The cron thing
fails out before it gets anywhere.
seph
Joe McDonagh writes:
> seph wr
; something?
Beats me. This version has always done that. Someone told me it was a
known bug, I've been ignoring it.
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To pos
These are the ubuntu packages.
r...@puppet-test:~# dpkg -s puppet | grep Version
Version: 0.24.8-1
r...@puppet-test:~# dpkg -s facter | grep Version
Version: 1.5.1-0.1
seph
Joe McDonagh writes:
> IDK if you saw my previous e-mail, but did you get this from
> ftp.ubuntu.
I got the same error when it was run from a puppetmaster, I switched to
a simpler local example to debug it.
If you don't have cron installed, does puppet error out, or install it
like it ought?
seph
Joe McDonagh writes:
> I'm running out of ideas, I do this same thing, on th
ty, and I don't think it solves all
problems.
I think I'll probably just rethink my setup, so I only have 1 keystore
per machine, but I'm not very pleased with that. Anyone have any
better suggestion? Any chance at getting better puppet support for
this sort of array handling?
seph
Key[x, y],
}
seph
Paul Lathrop writes:
> seph,
>
> You are making a couple of classic mistakes here. For one, thinking of
> definitions as "functions" can only end in tears. Definitions are just
> ways of abstracting a collection of resources into a single res
e
> to have more than one keystore declaration with the same keys parameter.
> One would have to preprocess the $keys parameter to prepend the keystore
> name to each element, and there's no way to do that in stock 0.24.8.
> (I think you will be able to do it in 0.25, by
It's supposed to be fixed in 0.25, which is now rc1. I haven't tried
0.25 yet
seph
Mike Harding writes:
> I am just starting with puppet, and the intended use was to manage ssh
> keys. Is there an intended release to fix this, or some other way to
> get it working?
>
figuration file: StoreConfigs not supported
without ActiveRecord 2.3
Is this an intentional dependancy? Any thoughts about what this means
for people running older/stable OSes?
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
; for
PGconn:Class
Any ideas?
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
pet/feature/rails.rb requires ActiveRecord
2.1, while lib/puppet/defaults.rb requires 2.3.
seph
writes:
> This looks similar to this problem:
> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2102
> Although the error message is different. Skipping the error message the
> error pops up because rub
After some digging, it turns out there's some weird incompatibility
between ActiveRecord 2.3.3 and one of the postgres drivers. I downgraded
to ActiveRecord 2.3.2 and passed this hurdle.
seph
seph writes:
> I manually installed a newer ActiveRecord and ActiveSupport on my
> puppet
/rails.rb is using to
detect activerecord fails for activerecord 2.0, which is what's in
ubuntu hardy.
Of course, if the requirement is for 2.1, than it's still newer than
what's in hardy, and manual gem installation is still needed.
seph
writes:
> This looks similar to th
lains that
it "Could not find resource type iptables"
I'm not really sure how to debug this. My clients do have the custom
type in their /var/lib/puppet directories, and AFAIK it's configured
correctly. But, it's just not working.
Does anyone module custo
what how this should work. I get this error
regardless of the filesystem permission on libdir. Here are the plugin
related settings on puppetmaster, I don't think they're wrong:
pluginsource = puppet://puppet/plugins
pluginsync = true
plugindest = /var/lib/puppet/lib
Does th
t sure what how this should work. I get this error
> regardless of the filesystem permission on libdir.
I pulled the debug/trace logs off the puppetmaster, I don't see anything
obviously wrong, but I've attached them.
I'm not finding much docume
shes that line to the clients.
>
> If anyone is interested in my configs, let me know and I can clean
> them up a bit and post them somewhere.
I have the same problem, and was thinking about implementing the same
style solution. I
is defined, and
if it's not then define it.
seph
Jon Stanley writes:
> I'm attempting to use virtual resources to get around multiple
> definition errors, but it doesn't seem to be working. I need to
> create a directory structure like "/apps/siteA/instance_1/res
r I'm confused. Either way, this is awesome.
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe f
I continue to wish for multidimensional objects. This is another
example.
seph
David Schmitt writes:
> Scott wrote:
>> So I'm running puppet 0.24.8 and I'm trying to use a definition where
>> sometimes the "name" parameter will be the same but other paramet
I've been assuming it's a typo, and means that the apache *service*
depends on the squid class. I'd love to know how to make a class depend
on another class.
seph
Douglas Garstang writes:
> Can someone tell me what a require => Class actually does? The
> documentat
rst example that comes to mind "This machine should have a
database named Foo" "...Oh, but only create it if it doesn't already
exist, otherwise you'll just get spurious errors"
Managing a bunch of modern software seems to boil down to process like
that.
seph
--~--~-
get source augeas
cd augeas_0.5.1
debuild -i -us -uc -b
seph
Adam Ryczkowski writes:
> Did anyone managed to get augeas running on Ubuntu 8.04? I tried for
> hours to get it working, but to no avail: No augeas on ubuntu
> repository, making from source fails (and the installation p
Adam Ryczkowski writes:
>> It was basically as simple as:
>>
>> apt-get build-dep augeas
>> apt-get source augeas
>> cd augeas_0.5.1
>> debuild -i -us -uc -b
>>
>> seph
>
> I have finally found time to try it out, but to no avail.
ot open database: unable to open database file
Well, it looks like the puppetmaster can't open the database file. Did
you configure it?
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to p
s#9f1334d1d3a6ea56), so being in a dead end I tried an
> opposite approach: to migrate my servers to more recent distribution.
>From my mail earlier in that thread:
Of course, now that I've actually tried using puppet and augeas, I've
discovered I also need the libaugeas-ruby pac
You could do something with a define. But I'm not really sure what your
use case is. Can you give an example?
seph
sysboy writes:
> Hi all,
>
>I want to use puppet to distribute keys to multiple users. I wanted
> to do something like we have already:
>
> - defin
ed, but what I can help you.
I define a bunch of users in user::virtual, along side said users I
define their keys. Some users have more than 1 key. (seph-2008-laptop,
seph-2009-desktop, for example)
Then I have things like this:
class user::unixadmins inherits user::virtual {
User <| titl
suggested emailing the community to get a
> list of settings that people would like to be able to preseed.
I think the only one I care about is "server". For me, everything after
that is set by puppet itself. But you could also add environment,
wait-time, boot-or-cron.
seph
--
You re
Frank Sweetser writes:
> I'm in the process of setting up sudoers entries to get managed by
> augeas.
If you can insure a suitable recent sudo, you can use sudo's #includedir
option and just manage a directory.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
honors the
http_proxy environmental variable. But I don't see how to use either of
those without patching the gem provider. Has anyone solved this?
I'm running on ubuntu hardy, with puppet 0.25.1.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pup
James Turnbull writes:
> seph wrote:
>> Hi all. My particular environment doesn't allow most of the machines to
>> make direct external connections, so I send a lot of things through
>> proxies. And now, I'm trying to figure out how to use puppet to install
>&g
ty normal dpkg build process for
it. (apt-get source; apt-get build-dep; debuild) No glibc weirdness.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscri
0.24 bug.
So I wonder if there's some droppings left from 0.24? Or if there's some
way to approach debugging this?
Anyone have a suggestion?
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send
ems related.
Both machines are running facter 1.5.7ubuntu1, which I don't think is
very old.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubsc
firewall issue.
seph
Peter Meier writes:
>>> this looks more like a facter issue. did you upgrade facter as well?
>>> how fast is it to run facter?
>>
>> Excellent suggestion. The new machine takes .8s for a facter run, where
>> the old one takes just under 2
system
stuff, I rebooted. Things seem to be running at normal speed. I'm kinda
weirded out by this fix.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
T
David Schmitt writes:
> On 3/24/2010 5:26 PM, seph wrote:
>> And, on the theory that all of this pointed to some weird system
>> stuff, I rebooted. Things seem to be running at normal speed. I'm kinda
>> weirded out by this fix.
>
> Perhaps some rogue proc
don't know which section of the config file to
put it in.
thanks
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googleg
, though not the ca cert
that way.
Is there a way to change the CA name as well, or do I have to manually
creating the CA for that?
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet User
I'm trying to use ssh_authorized_key to manage my user's ssh keys. I
basically have this (across a couple of files):
class user::virtual {
@user { "seph":
ensure => "present",
uid => "2001",
comment=> &quo
Ah ha. After a long time debugging this on irc (thanks guys!) I found
my typo. I had defined unixadmins twice, and one was wrong. Though if
people have suggestions for a better way to implement this sort of
thing, I'd love to hear them.
seph
On Apr 21, 4:00 pm, seph wrote:
> I'm
mta-system:/tmp/ordering# cat ordering-virtual.pp
@user { "seph":
ensure => "present",
uid=> "2001",
comment=> "seph",
home => "/home/seph",
shell => "/bin/bash",
allow
On Apr 22, 11:04 am, seph wrote:
> I'm also seeing this. I'm not sure what --graph is an option to, not my
> puppet.
Ah, I found --graph. It's just not in the help files.
If I don't have a user, then I get the aforementioned errors, and no
graphs. If I create the
do you ensure iptables is installed? Right now, I'm
just sticking a package resource in, but the first run results in
errors, when puppet tries to apply iptables rules before the binaries
exist.
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you ar
e solution here?
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
p
etd[4388]: Could not create 50 email-outbound:
undefined method `+\' for false:FalseClass
puppetd 1b [daemon.err] puppetd[4388]: Could not create 50 email-outbound:
undefined method `+\' for false:FalseClass
Anyone seen this or have
ogrammer, so I'm hoping someone has seen it before. Or
that someone has a pointer to an iptables module.
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group,
Wonderful, that patch seems to have solved this error. Thank you so much
for fixing it.
seph
Marc Fournier writes:
> Hello,
>
>
>> The first couple lines look like:
>>
>> err: Could not create 01 localhost spoofing in: undefined method
>> `+' for
&
fd number
sh: Syntax error: Bad fd number
notice: //Exec[echo 1 > /tmp/ran]/returns: executed successfully
r...@puppet-test:~#
r...@puppet-test:~# ls /tmp/ran
/tmp/ran
r...@puppet-test:~#
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because y
etd
> with --debug and looking at what command it's running.
In fact... Too much cargo culting led to a bad path parameter. Thanks
for the sanity check.
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Does anyone else have problems with the wiki? I feel kinda ungrateful
complaining, but I generally find it very slow and thus very hard to
use. And right now, it appears unresponsive.
seph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
68 matches
Mail list logo
