Hi all,
I just upgraded a client with puppet 2.7.9 to 2.7.10 and now the
authorized_keys started to loop
notice: /Stage[main]/Authorizedkey::UserX/
Authorizedkey::Manage[userx_dss_domainx_test]/
Ssh_authorized_key[userx_dss_domainx_test]/options: options changed
'no-port-forwarding,no-agent-forwa
Thanks
I run puppet on RHEL5 with Ruby 1.8.7
On Jan 27, 4:56 pm, Nan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:27 AM, rvlinden
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> > I just upgraded a client with puppet 2.7.9 to 2.7.10 and now the
> > authorized_keys
Hi,
I'm having some 'strange' issues with augeas and an onlyif statement
This is my code
augeas { "classx_sysctl_shmmax":
incl=> '/etc/sysctl.conf',
lens=> 'Sysctl.lns',
changes => "set kernel.shmmax ${sysctl_kernel_shmmax}",
onlyif => "get kernel.shmmax < ${sysctl_kerne
FYI,
I use puppet enterprise 2.0.2 and augeas 0.10 on RHEL6, but the same
problem occured on Puppet 2.7.9 and augeas 0.9 on RHEL5/6
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.c
All,
I used to download the Puppet and Facter RHEL5 rpm packages from
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~tmz/repo/puppet/epel/
but the latest version on that site is puppet 2.6.9 and facter 1.5.9.
Does anyone know if this site is the still maintained ? or if there
are other locations where the rpm
All,
The entire puppet configuration I have is based on the rule that nodes
can only have variables and/or classes.
below are two examples how I configured puppet to deal with an apache
installation and addding users
The 'apache' example does work perfectly, but the 'users' example does
not and t
Hi all,
I am working on rewriting my entire puppet environment and try to
'fix' 'Dynamic lookup' as it will be deprecated in some time, but even
after reading quite some docs and on the forum, it's not really clear
to me.
What I have read so far, is that each variable must be fully-qualified
or p
Thanks vagn,
Will have a look at your suggestion
On Jul 24, 1:14 am, vagn scott wrote:
> Node scope is not global scope. But, more interesting:
>
> On 07/23/2011 04:18 PM, rvlinden wrote:
>
> > I really love the way I can inherit from nodes and define new or
> > ove
All,
I was wondering if I could create a relationship between a define and
an exec (without using stages)
Example
I call a define 'sudo::manage' with the variable '$sudofile' where the
variable contains and array or sudofiles I want to deploy.
sudo::manage { $sudofile: }
Once the sudofiles are
Hi all,
Today I upgraded both my puppet server (2.7.1) a puppet client(s)
(2.6.9) to 2.7.3 and suddenly my modules didn't work anymore. I don't
know if 2.7.3 is more strict than 2.7.1, or if it's a bug, so I hope
someone can help me.
I have several modules where the file and/or directory are sepa
On Sep 16, 8:55 pm, Peter Meier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > I would reference from back from the sysconfig::permissions module to
> > the ntp module file by specifying
> > name => "/var/lib/ntp"
>
> > Do I need to change all my modules because I used a feature
On Sep 16, 8:55 pm, Peter Meier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > I would reference from back from the sysconfig::permissions module to
> > the ntp module file by specifying
> > name => "/var/lib/ntp"
>
> > Do I need to change all my modules because I used a feature
On Sep 17, 3:54 pm, Peter Meier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > A single manifests works fine, but this is not the only module I have
> > where I set permissions using the sysconfig::permissions module.
>
> Ah, now I as I read your problem better: The error indicat
Hi all,
I have three parameterized classes, named mq, mq_gsk and apache.
The mq class always calls the mq_gsk class, but the apache class
should only call the mq_gsk class when the mq class is not used in a
hosts' node definition
Here is my configuration
class mq (
$gsk_version = undef ) {
Hi,
I'm using puppet 2.7.3 on RHEL/CentOS and I have an issue which is now
a big blocking issue within my environment. What I'm trying to
accomplish wit puppet is a create a mountpoint, mount a filesystem on
it and install an application on that filesystems are set proper user/
group and permissio
On the RPM repo at http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/5/products/x86_64/,
the puppet-server rpm for 2.7.4 seems to be missing.
el5
puppet-2.7.4-1.el5.noarch.rpm
---
el6
puppet-2.7.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm
puppet-server-2.7.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
' homedir set to the mountpoint, still no issues.
For now I can not reproduce the autorequire I saw before where the
Exec["mkdir_/a/b/c"] was linked to File["/a/b/c"]
Rene
On Sep 29, 6:13 pm, jcbollinger wrote:
> On Sep 28, 5:02 pm, rvlinden wrote:
>
> > Hi,
Hi,
I was running puppet (2.7.5) on a host which needed to have some
settings changed in it's /boot/grub/menu.lst file. This file is
however a link to /boot/grub/grub.conf
When I used augeas in puppet like shown below
augeas { "${dom0::params::module_label}_menu.lst_memory": incl => '/
boot/grub
I have a virtual user (mqm) in puppet (v2.6.2 on CentOS 5.5 with Ruby
1.8.6.383-6)
@user {
"mqm":
ensure => present,
uid => "300",
gid => "300",
comment => "Functional user",
ho
Ruby shadow 1.4.1-7 was already installed so it has to be something
else
I will report it as a bug
On Nov 11, 11:26 pm, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> rvlinden writes:
> > I have a virtual user (mqm) in puppet (v2.6.2 on CentOS 5.5 with Ruby
> > 1.8.6.383-6)
>
> [...]
>
> &
I have a list of virtual users define (like the example below) and the
same account will be realized on servers where the account will be
local (/etc/passwd), but also on servers which have local accounts and
remote accounts (like LDAP and/or AD).
@user {
"userx":
ensure
hi john,
thanks for your suggestions, i can certainly use the renewed
declaration and I will have a look at the way you realized them,
Rene
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googl
Hi all,
I have no problem with creating ssh keys for users, but as soon as I
specify 'options', puppet keeps repeating and replacing the key with
an identical key.
I have written the various options in various formats, like one big
strings, as an array, with double quotes or single quotes, etc, e
BTW, the puppet version I use is 2.6.8 on Red Hat 5.6
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@goo
syntax
of the authorized_keys file
Regards,
Rene
On May 13, 1:29 pm, Felix Frank
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/13/2011 01:20 PM, rvlinden wrote:
>
> > as an array ...
>
> > @authorizedkey {
> > "userx_dss":
> > user => "use
Ssh_authorized_key["${name}"] {
options => $options,
} # End options
} # End if
} # End define setup
On May 13, 2:15 pm, Felix Frank
wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 01:49 PM, rvlinden wrote:
>
> > If I remove t
Hi all,
I'm wondering if puppet can create a variable based on another variable ??
Here is an example
3 global varibles
$::gbl_users_groups = app1,app2
$::gbl_users_accounts_app1 = app1user1,app1user2
$::gbl_users_accounts_app2 = app2user1,app2user2
What does work is this
$groups_name_ar
Sam,
You could make some changes to you site.pp and set some defaults like this
Exec {
schedule => $::globalvars_schedule,
noop => $::globalvars_noop,
}
File {
schedule => $::globalvars_schedule,
noop => $::globalvars_noop,
}
Group {
schedule => $::globalvars_schedule,
noop => $::glo
Run openssl to create a 1024 DH keypair
# openssl dhparam 1024
and add this block of code (incl BEGIN DH PARAMETERS and END DH PARAMETERS to
your /etc/katello/certs/katello-apache.crt on your satellite server
Hope this helps
Rene
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
29 matches
Mail list logo
