[Puppet Users] Puppet Dashboard / inventory service question

2012-03-02 Thread bg
I have several hundred nodes I'm migrating to being managed by Puppet. We do have a handful of older servers that can't run Puppet (RH8 etc), and won't be upgraded any time soon, unfortunately. I'd like to be able to have an 'artificial' node created with accurate inventory data displayed in Pu

[Puppet Users] Re: 32bit and 64bit version of a package

2012-03-21 Thread bg
I may not understand your problem fully, but I do something similar in one of my base classes as I had a similar HP software dependency: case $operatingsystem { centos: { case $operatingsystemrelease { 5.0,5.1,5.2,5.3,5.4,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.8,5.9: { include rhel

[Puppet Users] Re: Preparing Schema: Installing Dashboard

2012-03-25 Thread bg
Error says it all:rack (~> 1.1.0) You have 1.4.1, which I believe is pulled in as a dependency, you need 1.1.0. gem install rack -v 1.1.0 gem uninstall rack -v 1.4.1 On Friday, March 23, 2012 1:49:38 PM UTC-5, Gmoney wrote: > > When I run this command:: > > rake RAILS_ENV=production db:mig

[Puppet Users] Help with simple function

2011-01-07 Thread bg
users/lib/puppet/parser/functions/getpw.rb' => true irb(main):003:0> Puppet::Parser::Functions.function(:getpw) => "function_getpw""function_getpw" The error I get when running from a client: err: /Stage[main]/snip::Add_user[bag_ppro]/User[bg]/password: change from

[Puppet Users] Re: Help with simple function

2011-01-07 Thread bg
Thanks for the suggestion Deet, I got it working with something along those lines, except using a shell script, as my Ruby skills are weak, which led to my initial problems. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group

Re: [Puppet Users] Help with simple function

2011-01-07 Thread bg
That was my guess, I'm sure I'll the error in my ways as I become more fluent in Puppet. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send em

[Puppet Users] Facter fact length?

2012-07-21 Thread bg
This is a bit of a leading question, but is there a limitation as far as length/size of facts on a node? I have a need to perform one way sync of user accounts (non-Puppet managed users) on many pairs of servers. Thus far, it's been done with scripts from primary -> backup server, and has been

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter fact length?

2012-07-24 Thread bg
oo simple to mont a dictionary > attack, isn't ? > > 2012/7/22, bg : > > This is a bit of a leading question, but is there a limitation as far as > > length/size of facts on a node? > > > > I have a need to perform one way sync of user accounts (non-Puppet

Re: [Puppet Users] Facter fact length?

2012-07-24 Thread bg
; figure out which is which somehow. > > Applying the KISS principle I would rsync to different directories and > find something else to do - like set up LDAP ;) - or manage user account > from the backup server and push them out to the nodes. > > Cheers, > Den > &g