each of the userid directories.
Else, the owner/group would be sys or whatever else.
I'm thinking of other stuff too, but my basic question is, does puppet
support using regular expressions in if/else statements like this or
am I really trying to get too crazy?
Thanks in advance for bearin
main, but I put it in the puppetmasterd stanza.
Hope that helps you too!
--Ryan
On Jun 9, 11:13 am, CraftyTech wrote:
> Correction: I copied the foreman.rb to /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/
> puppet/reports/foreman.rb from extras/puppet/foreman/files/foreman-
> report.rb. The instructio
Hi Steven,
I ran into the same problem this morning when rolling some new facter/
puppet packages for RHEL4. Going back to facter 1.5.2 seems to be a
usable workaround at the moment.
-ryan
On Feb 5, 10:48 am, "Steven Nemetz" wrote:
> > On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:49 PM, Ste
If I wanted to allow all the variables normally set within params.pp
to also be assigned as class parameters or as global variables how
would I do this?
I still want all the variables to be initially set to defaults within
the params.pp class but allow for them to be overridden at the node
level.
to be overridden by global namespace variables
(for enc support)
3. further allow parametrized class declarations to take precedence
over 1 and 2
Can you point me to a module that does this? Alternatively, can you
make a recommendation for module best practices going forward.
Thanks,
Ryan Bowlby
O
pache':
ssl_package => true,
}
}
I'm just trying to do things "right" the first time.
On Jan 17, 9:59 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ryan Bowlby wrote:
> > Thanks for the great replies Nigel. As a person currently rolling out
> &g
Show off! ;) Great example thanks.
I noticed you fully qualify variables within the very class they were
assigned. Is that best practice now?
I've created a simple apache module using your openssh module as
inspiration. I still need to modify params.pp to check for globally
defined vars. In the c
t; 200 343 "-" "curl/7.15.5 (x86_64-
redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.15.5 OpenSSL/0.9.8b zlib/1.2.3 libidn/
0.6.5"
That's a request from another server. Here are the Apache configs:
http://pastebin.com/rDKPSjjy
Thanks everyone!
Ryan Bowlby
--
You received this message be
Classes can only be declared once while defines can be declared
multiple times. So if you wanted two vhost files a define would be
needed.
On Jan 26, 3:47 pm, Joehillen wrote:
> whoa, my bad. I learned puppet before 2.6
>
> Now I don't know why there is a distinction between classes and defines.
p will allow you access to just
about every package you would need without causing crazy dependency
issues.
-Ryan
On Jan 26, 3:33 pm, Gmoney wrote:
> I have been trying to follow the bootstrap instructions for installing
> puppet-dashboard. I keep getting error about rubyge(rake) an
a lesser known repo.
Thanks again,
Ryan Bowlby
On Jan 26, 11:37 pm, Brice Figureau
wrote:
> On 27/01/12 02:14, Ryan Bowlby wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
>
> > I have a two puppet servers using Apache with mod_proxy as the
> > frontend. Similar to what what's describe
I second checking for required environment variables. Attempt to run
in a shell that hasn't sourced your .bash_profile and related login-
time config files. Also, try it with an exec with "/bin/bash -x /etc/
init.d/dropbox start" to further troubleshoot.
On Jan 30, 3:05 pm, "Richard K. Miller"
w
Wrap the file resource in an if that checks if $conf_file is defined.
I would also recommend replacing the case statement with a
parametrized class with the default for $conf_file being undef.
Also, if you were okay with having a default blank file present then
you could just replace your current
Thank you, you just added hours to my life! 3.0.11 works perfect. Perhaps
the puppetlabs docs should make note of this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pu
created a command line utility that prints a list of resources managed
by puppet then that would do as well.
Cheers,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
were encountered.
Thanks!!!
Ryan Bowlby
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@google
ever since. As both a Puppet user and a Puppet Labs employee,
I'm giddy to see content like this and hundreds of other great
community-driven modules on the Forge.
Keep it up folks, you're fantastic.
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I'm having an issue where every single puppet node included our yum
class as part of the catalog. In all instances the nodes node
definition was empty. Has anyone experienced something like this
before? Is the yum class colliding with an internal class?
We do not define a node default or use any n
Nailed it. Accidentally had the include outside the class at "top-
level". That's a scary uhum feature. Might need to look into
integrating some test code that looks for top-level includes within
the modules dir and warns. Thanks John!
-Ryan
On Mar 29, 5:42 am, jcbollinger wrote:
o continue running the agent as a daemon.
Thanks,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr
d to the
use of custom functions that rely on a central server, virtual
resources(?), etc. I would try to scale your masters as it's not that
hard.
-Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this gro
.
if defined(os::motd) {
# list this module/class in motd
os::motd::register {"pulp": }
}
}
The question is whether this is the right way to go about it? Does the
define wait for all class declarations before checking (does order
matter)?
Thanks,
Ryan
--
You received this
x27;t want to include os::motd on each node means all
three options don't work.
I'm starting to think using the os::motd::register defined type in
every module is not the way to go. Perhaps using exported resources is
a more flexible method of achieving this?
Thanks,
Ryan
On May 3,
On Tuesday, May 8, 2012 6:36:02 AM UTC-7, Erik Dalén wrote:
>
>
> That still holds true (unless you want to micromanage access permissions).
>
> There is however a way to create a directory per host that is only
> accessible by that host:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/puppet-users/XB
Unfortunately, you'll need to rename your apacheWS folder to apachews.
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:09:58 PM UTC-7, Amit Shah wrote:
>
> puppet 2.6.4
> puppet --configprint modulepath
> /home/user/.puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
>
> I have the following file defined: /home/user/.puppe
s.com/issues/14431
If you haven't already discovered this, it's quite easy to create your
own custom facts for getting the information you want and we'd love to
see you upload those additions to the Forge.
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/custom_facts.html
Cheers!
--Ryan
--
You r
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Philip Brown wrote:
> Given that the current module definitions require known locations for factor
> extensions, I find this a bit odd.
> How about making the uploader autotag 'facter' any module that has files
> under lib/facter ?
That's precisely what I'm askin
so, looks like we've got a ticket
tracking that feature request.
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/13598
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Brian Gupta wrote:
> Will general best practice for forge modules to be developed against
> current latest puppet version, or maintain backward compatibility
> going forward? e.g. - let's say there is a version of a module that
> works with 2.7, when Telly ships wi
Hi James,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, thedonkdonk wrote:
> I have a large puppet master / client setup with lots of files and
> templates and modules and so on. Is there a way to make a stand alone
> manifest for one server so I can hand it to a third party?
If you mean to take the resultan
ference: http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/rest_auth_conf.html
HTH,
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send emai
lso want to experiment with shipping modules and manifests to
your remote machines and using Puppet Apply to locally compile a
catalog, move files around and so on.
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to
On May 4, 6:34 am, jcbollinger wrote:
> On May 4, 1:54 am, Dan Carley wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 3 May 2012 23:32, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> > > Hmm. I guess I misunderstood your objective. It is still true that
> > > 'defined' is not a good approach, however, and also that
> > > os::motd:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Dick Davies
wrote:
> They are, but have just realised they only get pushed out in the initial
> puppet run...hum, bit of a catch 22 here.
New plugins do get transferred to an agent with pluginsync = true
before the actual Puppet run. If your plugins change on the
the
> code?
Could you please post the puppet-load command you're using? I've not
encountered any issues increasing the concurrency. Perhaps its a
mishandled syntax error.
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users&
ifests/nodes.pp:24
> on node jay.foo.com
> warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
> err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
> root@jay:~#
>
In this case, Puppet is telling you that you can only override
resources in a class that inherits another class. You can't do
e class for "specialhost"? Is this possible and if not what are
the common workarounds?
Thanks,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscri
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Ryan Bowlby wrote:
> Hi All,
Hi!
>
> Is there a way to override the value of a parameter to a declared
> class within my base class. My nodes use a base class that
> occasionally need to be changed. Example:
Yes, there are several ways. One c
r) is what you'd
like to consider success, you can tell Puppet what return code should
indicate success with the returns parameter:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/stable/type.html#exec
HTH!
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pu
up just doing a few simple wrapper parameters as advised by
Nick. I like the Hiera idea but it will have to wait since we have so
much low hanging fruit to pick for the time being. Thanks everyone!
-Ryan
On May 30, 2:00 pm, jcbollinger wrote:
> On May 30, 2:37 pm, Ryan Bowlby wr
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Gary Larizza wrote:
> Reports, on the other hand, contain information on transactional
> events FROM a Puppet run. Reports are stored in the Puppet Dashboard,
> which is a separate database
I think it's also important to point out, since you weren't specific
in yo
ake sure that you have a pe_accounts module in
/opt/puppet/share/puppet/modules (that path should be in your
modulepath as well).
If it had been removed somehow, you can find it in the 'modules'
folder in an expanded PE installer tarball.
HTH,
--Ryan
--
You received this messa
Package["rsync"])
...
}
We obviously would create individual modules for packages that require any
advanced logic: apache, tomcat, etc. What would be the downside to doing
this?
Thanks,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet U
esource to stop
replacing the file on each run. I was hoping the file resource would ignore
any lines propagated by the file_line resource. Is this a bug or am I just
missing something?
-Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group
h can be used on the
same file. The current conflict doesn't have to be a conflict, I assumed
puppet did this already.
-Ryan
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 9:58:23 AM UTC-7, Jeff McCune wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Ryan Bowlby wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
x27;m looking into this more closely, will attempt to mimic your setup
and get back to you when I have more information.
--Ryan
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:47 AM, llow...@oreillyauto.com
wrote:
> I'm running puppet in a local VM to do some testing, and all of our systems
> are behind a pro
ch describes
the other module dependancies (if any). puppetlabs-stdlib does not
have dependancies on other modules.
Thanks for providing your proxy information from puppet.conf. Is your
system otherwise configured for using a proxy?
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
don't want your modules to be publicly
accessible? Any other requirements would be useful to hear about too.
Thanks!
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegrou
e consuming them to manage infrastructure and
solve problems.
--Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppe
Binaries like curl and test must be fully qualified (ex. /bin/rm) or you
must pass the path attribute to your exec resource with a search path like
'/bin:/usr/bin' as the value.
HTH, --Ryan
On Monday, July 2, 2012, Benjamin Lei wrote:
> Here's what I'm using:
> ex
On Monday, July 2, 2012, Benjamin Lei wrote:
> So fully qualified means I need to add in a path to the command I'm trying
> to execute (i.e. test/grep)?
Yep. The command should execute at that point. :-)
>
> On Monday, July 2, 2012 9:14:25 PM UTC-7, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>>
to remove
other versions of a gem it is managing, so that only the version you
specify remains.
Has anyone else experienced this issue, or have any thoughts?
Thanks,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this
The approach I've used is similar - automatically sign new CSRs so
that new nodes can be added without human interaction.
In order to then apply a configuration to the node, the hostnames for
my machines all conform to a pattern, which I then match against a
regular expression in the node manifest
You can indeed use Exported resources.
See the first example in this documentation:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/exported_resources.html
The example shows how to have every host export its SSH public key,
and then collect every host’s key and install it in the
ssh_known_hosts file (which is
manage the passwords if you're running in debug mode.
Ryan
On Aug 3, 1:35 am, Len Rugen wrote:
> You aren't sending the password, you are sending the "shadow". On one
> system, set the desired password, get the shadow value, put that in puppet.
>
> [root@localhost ~]# p
> > The absolute nicest option is to use a bundled certificate authority
> where
> > all CAs are signed by some higher level Cert, then most of these
> problems go
> > away. Last I heard this was broken in Puppet / Ruby.
>
> That used to work before 0.25, sadly broken since.
> Ruby fully suppor
hot standby, it would still be best to
sync bi-directionally. What are others doing?
-Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this g
I'm new to Puppet, and I'm a software developer, not a sysadmin, so be
gentle. I have puppet managing some files via templates, and one of
the template variables that needs to be plugged in is a password of
sorts that shouldn't be generally available. In particular, it can't
be stored in the manife
Welcome!
To start off, you may find http://docs.puppetlabs.com/#learning-puppet &
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/environment.html useful.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://gro
On Dec 23, 11:33 am, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Ryan Stewart wrote:
> > I'm new to Puppet, and I'm a software developer, not a sysadmin, so be
> > gentle. I have puppet managing some files via templates, and one of
> > the template var
On Dec 23, 11:33 am, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> http://www.craigdunn.org/2011/10/secret-variables-in-puppet-with-hier...
>
> Does that help?
>
> I've done this in the past without hiera, where you have a function that
> runs on the master to decrypt the content out of version control, but the
> above
On Dec 27, 5:00 pm, Ryan Stewart wrote:
> Before jumping into hiera, I was trying to get a feel for extlookup()
> with CSV files because it looked pretty simple, but I can't seem to
> make it work.
nm. I figured out what I was doing wrong.
--
You received this message b
On Dec 28, 11:33 am, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Ryan Stewart wrote:
> > On Dec 27, 5:00 pm, Ryan Stewart wrote:
> > > Before jumping into hiera, I was trying to get a feel for extlookup()
> > > with CSV files because it looked pretty
On Monday, December 26, 2011 5:56:26 AM UTC-8, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> I just ran into an interesting scenario where I didn't know how to
> scope my variables and I'd just like to share for the crowd.
>
> Suppose you have two modules 'foo' and 'bar'. You also have two
> defines, 'foo::do_stuff'
Anyone have experience and willing to share for Beanstalk?
e.g.
How does Puppet fit in when we mainly use AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
Seems most features are provided by Beanstalk.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this gr
I have a somewhat abstract best practice question. In some instances
fully applying a node's puppet catalog results in that node
interacting with production infrastructure. Sometimes you want to
provision a new host and have it apply it's puppet catalog but not yet
integrate into the production env
b.
>
> He'll be starting in early May, and should be joining us here in
> Portland, Oregon in June.
>
> Welcome to the company, James.
>
No kidding... I half thought James already worked for PuppetLabs :)
Congratulations!
Cheers,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you
Awesome :)
On 7/9/2010 11:58 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
> Welcome back again to the Puppet release cycle with the long-awaited
> eleventy times better 2.6.0rc1 release!
>
> The 2.6.0 release is a major feature release and includes a huge variety
> of new features, fixes, updates and enhancements.
ts run randomly once an hour for
most operations. Disk intensive operations (package installs) are dealt
with during the configured schedule. My configuration has something
that looks like this:
class Foo {
package {
bar:
schedule => daily, ensure => present;
}
}
any
> And are you using --onetime to trigger these random runs, via cron or
> something?
> -Alan
>
We run puppet from cron via wrapper. The wrapper looks for a file that
signals "not to run" if we are in a maintenance mode.
Cheers,
Ryan
--
You received this message because
Hi Oliver, try:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Using_Multiple_Environments
On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Oliver wrote:
> Now that cucumber-puppet is a Puppet Labs project, I guess it is time
> to email questions about it here ;)
>
> I'm in the process of adding RoR environment
I've not actually tried but I would think you should be able to do
something like:
package {
"foo.i386": { ensure => latest ; }
}
I know yum understands the syntax of: yum install foo.i386 (or foo.x86_64).
Cheers,
Ryan
On 9/16/2010 6:05 AM, Geoff wrote:
> How do you do
he hostname and other bits. Upon reboot, puppet was
run for the first time out of /etc/rc.local doing the rest.
Cheers,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegrou
I'd be in favor of only maintaining one rev behind for compatibility (2.7.x
will support 2.6.x but not earlier).
Cheers,
Ryan
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> Gary Law writes:
>>> On 24 Nov
This is exactly what we used schedules for. System software.was.only
updated at specific times to ensure that we got the maximum io from our
disks.
On Jan 17, 2011 6:50 PM, "Daniel Pittman" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 18:38, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> I'm trying to get a fee...
At my previous j
Okay... that's very cool (and thanks for the github example repo for nodeless
puppet!). This plus the 'scaling puppet with git' [0] concepts I'll use here
at Lookout, Inc.
Cheers,
Ryan
[0] -
http://bitfieldconsulting.com/scaling-puppet-with-distributed-version-control
:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4478 The notice messages have the right
MD5 for managed files but only empty files are written to disk.
I'm assuming this might be the clients running an older version?
Any other thoughts here?
Cheers,
Ryan
--
You received this message because yo
Yep. That is exactly what was going on. Once the clients were brought up
to the same rev, things went back to normal.
Cheers,
Ryan
On Mar 14, 2011 5:31 PM, "Peter Meier" wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm assuming this might be the clients runnin
Hi,
I was curious if anyone out there could point me in the right direction to best
practices in writing (spec) tests for modules. My #{search provider}-fu is
failing this morning and I'd like to get beyond the basic pre/post commit hooks
of basic syntax checking.
Cheers,
Ryan
--
I can get behind that. Nominated :)
On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Michael T. Halligan wrote:
>
> I just nominated Reductive Labs for a Crunchie in the "Best Enterprise
> Startup" category, if only because it's the kind of ridiculous SF startup
> popularity game that I think would annoy Luke
Agreed. Great collection of testing links.
Cheers,
Ryan
On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Christian Kauhaus wrote:
>
> Patrick Debois schrieb:
>> I've put my collection of infrastructure testing links online:
>> http://www.jedi.be/blog/2009/11/12/collection-of-test-driv
heh!
On Jan 25, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Allan Marcus wrote:
> re: font size.
>
> It looks fine to me on Safari 4 on the Mac.
>
> Note: for every year after 40 you need to press command-plus once :-)
>
> ---
> Thanks,
>
> Allan Marcus
> 505-667-5666
--
You received this message because you are sub
ry. If the provisioning process is
working well you can likely do a rolling reinstall of the infrastructure to
ensure against system "state drift". That's often much easier than
attempting to write each module to support the arguably antiquated idea of
rollbacks.
-Ryan
Hope T
.
-Ryan
On Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:34:39 AM UTC-7, Hai wrote:
>
> instead of using hostname wildcard, is there a way to define nodes by
> their IP addresses? for example, I want to put all nodes with 10.0.2.x and
> 10.0.3.0 to a nodes group called "testing". how can
Hi John,
Unfortunately, we don't yet have that capability but are interested in
exploring it. Would you mind elaborating on your needs and what you'd
want from a private Forge in addition to what the public Forge offers?
--Ryan
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:45 AM, jtimon wrote:
> We
fact that each machine populates
into the Dashboards inventory service.
HTH,
--Ryan
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:54 AM, llow...@oreillyauto.com
wrote:
> Is there a way to get a list of all the classes available from the puppet
> master?
>
> I have 2 goals for this - one is documentation
Crap, I forgot to mention my source:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/templating.html#access-to-defined-tags-and-classes
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> One way to approach this (for documentation) is to build a file
> resource backed by a template. The template
That's not really a puppet question. Typically installation of software in
normal (posix compliant) locations requires root privileges. Merely
limiting the commands one is capable of executing via sudo would likely be
enough.
-Ryan
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 10:29:33 PM UTC-7, Ganesh G
received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Nick Fagerlund
wrote:
> Anyway, back to the point: I recommend that you start a new thread on this
> group talking about what you and your people need in terms of module
> documentation formats. Ryan Coleman, the product owner for modules and the
>
. What
then would be the advantages of librarian-puppet?
Thanks,
Ryan Bowlby
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/4Kf47PY2sIwJ.
To po
ke it you're talking about a future release where pulp has a plugin
model and is more of a generalized "manage all the things" tool? Is there
going to be a plugin for the forge or something?
-Ryan
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, ohad wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 24
We went with git super projects and submodules instead of librarian-puppet.
Might want to look at using git for management of per puppet-module
repositories as well.
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:37:10 AM UTC-7, llo...@oreillyauto.com wrote:
>
> I've heard this project mentioned a few times a
at version of the puppetlabs-mysql module are you using? Did you
clone from master on GitHub or are you using the latest released code
from the Puppet Forge? -> http://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs/mysql
--Ryan
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Rakesh K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to p
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Rakesh K wrote:
> For mysql I am using the module
> https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-mysql
>
> What I am observing is mysql is gets installed and everything but no db is
> added, also intermittently the password is not set, it is neither not blank
> nor do
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Rakesh K wrote:
> Any updates ??
Sorry Rakesh, I was waiting for your response to Nan's comments. I've
pasted them below for reference.
>>>
Yeah, per Ryan, most likely you already have an existing password, and
you need to set old_root_p
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Rakesh K wrote:
>
> Actually I have tried fresh install of the module multiple times after
> clearing all traces of the mysql package on the client but still getting the
> same result.
Ok. Have you tried using the released Forge module instead of the
GitHub code i
+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
--
Ryan Coleman | about.me/ryc
Modules & Forge @ Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Foster Rilindo wrote:
> I currently have puppet configured to use node definitions in
> /etc/puppet/manifests/node.pp. At the time, most of the machines are physical
> hosts.
>
> Now I need to start putting puppet on virtual guests. Ideally, I want to use
> an EN
Well that's embarrassing. It seems as those the 'cleaned' match of the
case statement isn't actually closed. :-/
Would you try adding a closing brace in lvm/manifests/init.pp around
like 26, where this code appears? It should close the 'cleaned: {'
block.
}
#
# Just clean up the logical volum
1 - 100 of 373 matches
Mail list logo
