[Puppet Users] Possible to maintain bad configs on the client?

2008-10-08 Thread Robert Rati
I have puppetmaster running on RHEL4, and 2 puppet clients running on RHEL5. All machines are running puppet version is 24.4 installed from EPEL. The issue is that some configurations seem to be unusable by the RHEL5 clients when the puppetmaster is running on RHEL4. However, if I put those

[Puppet Users] Re: Possible to maintain bad configs on the client?

2008-10-08 Thread Robert Rati
quot;NEGOTIATOR_HOST =\nCONDOR_HOST =\n\n## A list of all potential central managers in the pool.\nCOLLECTOR_HOST = host.tion debug level \nREPLICATION_DEBUG = D_COMMAND\n## Replication log file\nREPLICATION_LOG = $(LOG)/ReplicationLog\n" Has anyone else seen this before? Rob Robert Rati wro

[Puppet Users] Re: Possible to maintain bad configs on the client?

2008-10-08 Thread Robert Rati
_COMMAND ## Replication log file REPLICATION_LOG = $(LOG)/ReplicationLog Andrew Shafer wrote: > What does the template look like? > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > I'm discover

[Puppet Users] Re: Possible to maintain bad configs on the client?

2008-10-08 Thread Robert Rati
), and running erb against the original 106 line template on the RHEL4 machine produces the expected results. It seems the length of the template has an effect on the results for some reason... Rob Evan Hisey wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

[Puppet Users] allow statements in namespaceauth.conf

2008-11-19 Thread Robert Rati
The namespaceauth.conf file seems to require FQDNs in the allow statements, but does anyone know if 'allow puppet' (assuming a correctly configured DNS CNAME record exists for puppet) will be accepted? Specifically, if I have a namespaceauth.conf that contains: [puppetrunner] allow puppet