ng catalog for r4.osinka.int
info: Applying configuration version '1320071507'
notice: /Stage[main]/Nginx/Notify[Architecture x86_64]/message:
current_value absent, should be Architecture x86_64 (noop)
Any ideas? Where to dig?
Regards,
Alexander Azarov
--
You received this message beca
, use the hardwaremodel fact.
> # Gentoo and Debian call "x86_86" "amd64".
> # Gentoo also calls "i386" "x86".
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Alexander Azarov
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Can you help me diagnose a probl
The simplest default, that is WEBrick I guess.
On Monday, October 31, 2011 10:28:12 PM UTC+4, Adrien Thebo wrote:
>
> Just as a curiosity, what web server are you using for your puppet master?
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Alexander Azarov
> wrote:
> > This is De
86_64']/message: defined 'message' as
'operatingsystem='Debian' architecture='x86_64''
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Alexander Azarov
> wrote:
> > The simplest default, that is WEBrick I guess.
> >
> > On Monday, October 31
put of
> facter and puppet with the architecture, operatingsystem, and
> facterversion facts?
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Alexander Azarov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, November 3, 2011 8:27:01 PM UTC+4, Adrien Thebo wrote:
> >>
> >&
27;architecture.rb'` to see if there's any way there could be another
> fact definition for this? Although at this point I'm starting to
> suspect bogons.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Alexander Azarov wrote:
> > Yes, I had an idea I have different versions
, not in use. I can safely remove
them, but I doubt it will help.
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Alexander Azarov
> wrote:
> > No problems, I've isolated the part of manifest that depends on
> > "architecture", so everything works through a hack right now.
On Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:12:51 AM UTC+4, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Could you get the versions of facter in
> > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/facter.rb and
> > /usr/lib/vservers/*/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/facter.rb and see if they
> > differ?
>
>
> Not been following this th
