On 19/09/12 06:11, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
Hi All,
In our environment, we use the $::environment variable extensively to
determine if the host should have one set of mounts (e.g. production)
or a different set of mounts (e.g. qa). This is just one example, but
there are many others where the $:
Hi All,
I am having some problems getting PuppetDB and SSL to work. I build an test
environment in Vagrant without any problems but when it try and deploy it
to my production environment I can't seem to get it to work with SSL. I
followed the instructions on the puppetlabs website and I made s
On 16 September 2012 22:25, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> On 09/16/2012 11:31 AM, Dick Davies wrote:
>> We only provision a few nodes a day max. so that works ok. Lately I've
>> been
>> thinking of replacing Cobbler with The Foreman, which has better
>> Puppet integration.
>
>
> What does foreman provide
Hi,
A have a question related to this thread. I'd like to ask, is the Foreman smart
proxy amenable to being configured using Puppet, to the extent of being able to
define the systems that are PXE booted within Puppet? Or is there some other
existing means of configuring PXE booted systems from Pu
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:11:24 AM UTC-5, Gonzalo wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> In our environment, we use the $::environment variable extensively to
> determine if the host should have one set of mounts (e.g. production) or a
> different set of mounts (e.g. qa). This is just one example, bu
It's my fault =(
I haeded wrong directive at auth.conf
path /
auth any
#allow *
When i uncommented it, i can download directory recursively.
вторник, 18 сентября 2012 г., 17:04:32 UTC+4 пользователь itJunky написал:
>
> In manifest i have this instruction:
>
>file { "/etc/apache2":
>
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 1:36:53 PM UTC-5, Philip Brown wrote:
>
> [yes, this is a reply to an OOOLD message. sorry :) I think it's still
> useful]
>
> This is regarding a construct that I suggested to the list back in May,
> and still haven't found anything better for my purposes.
> So,
Hi, I'm new to Puppet and, tbh, still evaluating Puppet and Chef. The time
has come to install both in a proof-of-concept environment.
I'm wondering if I should install Puppet 2 (2.6.16 is available in my Yum
repo) or whether I should go with Puppet 3.
Is there a document that lists the differe
Hello!
I'm just getting started working with Puppet and testing on a Windows 2003
server. When I run facter on this server it returns a wrong value for the
ipaddress (should be 10.10.0.203, but facter sets ipaddress=10.0.0.203). As
you can see from the following ipconfig output, facter is looki
Puppet 2.7.19 is the latest stable release, Puppet 3.0 is still in RC.
To give your proof of concept a fair trial, I'd say go with Puppet 2.7.
All of the documentation on PuppetLabs' site is for 2.7 too.
http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/6Server/products/x86_64/
On 19/09/12 16:29, Mark wrote:
Hi, I
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Mark wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to Puppet and, tbh, still evaluating Puppet and Chef. The time
> has come to install both in a proof-of-concept environment.
>
> I'm wondering if I should install Puppet 2 (2.6.16 is available in my Yum
> repo) or whether I should go with
Thanks Luke,
I'm also looking for some information about the feature differences between
the two major versions.
Mark
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Luke Bigum wrote:
> Puppet 2.7.19 is the latest stable release, Puppet 3.0 is still in RC. To
> give your proof of concept a fair trial, I'd s
Jo,
I did figure it out, not sure if you saw my last post on this. Per my last
post I said, "it turns out I was using 'source' instead of 'content' within
my file declaration in my manifest."
So it had nothing to do with the erb file at all. Regarding the @ symbol,
it was a red herring. In fac
Thanks for the installation tips! You just saved me a bunch of work :)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Jeff McCune wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Mark wrote:
>
>> Hi, I'm new to Puppet and, tbh, still evaluating Puppet and Chef. The
>> time has come to install both in a proof-of-co
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Mitchell Hashimoto <
mitchell.hashim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jeff McCune wrote:
>
>>
>> In Telly (Puppet 3.0.0), we support plugins distributed as rubygems, so
>> `require "foo/bar"` will work in this scenario, but only if the plugi
Hi,
I'm trying to figure if this is the right way to update my system. So,
- Is the include function the best way to use dependency between classes or
should I use 'Class['foo'] -> Class['bar'] instead?
- The 'require => Exec['apt-weekly-update'],' is being executed for every array
element. Ho
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:36 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 1:36:53 PM UTC-5, Philip Brown wrote:
>>...
>> ...
>
> I think that's just fine. Though no one would know from the responses you
> received before, I think some people do pretty much what you're describing.
Hi SirHopcount,
How did you install PuppetDB? Is there any chance that any of your certs
(agent / master) have changed since the time when you installed?
I've found that sometimes the easiest way to get things fixed up when you
have this problem is to do the following:
0) Stop puppetdb
1) rem
I'm not sure if this is a cobbler or puppet issue, so please forgive the
crossposting.
I configured some repos in cobbler and set the local mirror flag. However,
when I use puppet to install packages, they don't use my local mirror.
This means that installs take forever as I'm on a slow connectio
The currently existing ruby gems version of puppet (2.7.18) is not fully
compatible with solaris 11 packages. It whines about some packages not
matching the regular expression.
I hunted around, and found a patch in the ruby bug database... which doesnt
work.
I found a new version of pkg.rb in
Dear Puppet Enterprise Users,
Puppet Enterprise 2.6.0 is now available. Puppet Enterprise is a
maintenance and feature release of Puppet Enterprise.
As a current Puppet Enterprise user, you can upgrade to this new
version as part of your annual subscription. As always, if upgrading,
it is recomme
I'm using puppet to automate the creation and maintenance of my hadoop
cluster. However, I'm not sure how to handle this next step. In order for
the cluster to run, the namenode needs to be formatted.
su hdfs -c "/usr/bin/hadoop namenode -format"
I'm not sure what the best method to handle this
I'm in the process of trying to get automated testing for my modules, using
puppet-lint, rspec-puppet, puppetlabs_spec_helper and Jenkins.
Are there any automated, or semi-automated ways to ensure coverage on my
tests? At the moment I am writing tests for existing modules, but I also
need to be
Hi,
It sounds like you would like to reduce some of the boilerplate code around
your testing? I happened to notice this article you may find useful:
http://puppetlabs.com/blog/the-next-generation-of-puppet-module-testing/
best wishes, JS
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
There seems to be a few vmware tools installation modules. Has someone
used these modules to install VMware tools?
Searching http://forge.puppetlabs.com ...
NAMEDESCRIPTION
AUTHORKEYWORDS
vchoi-vmwarePuppet module to handle installation, upg
We have one script that is called to bootstrap and provision new VMs. There's
another one for destroying. These scripts are also responsible for logging
into the puppet master (via ssh), polling for the cert to be created (puppet
cert list) and then issuing the sign/clean commands.
--
You re
Use heira. Heira can load a config file based on the environment. Setting
this up is as simple as creating a hiera definition such as...
(environment).yaml
... And then creating the following files: production.yaml and staging.yaml
that contain your environment specific configs.
Install the
Hi Josh,
I have realized my noob-ness since asking this question. I think it comes down
to my mindset of thinking procedurally rather than in the puppet mindset of
deterministically http://puppetlabs.com/blog/inside-puppet-about-determinism/
This are all great and useful comments: I will pass t
Hi Alan,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Alan Phillips wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm just getting started working with Puppet and testing on a Windows 2003
> server. When I run facter on this server it returns a wrong value for the
> ipaddress (should be 10.10.0.203, but facter sets ipaddress=10.0.0.2
Hi,
Cobbler can put the desired repo in /etc/yum.repo.d - but I have in the past
explicitly cleared that directory (from the cobbler post install (kickstart
really)) and managed the repos via puppet only.
First thing puppet did was install the right repo. It was the cleanest way I
found.
HTH
Hi,
Tricky one. In the past I have used a touch file to test against (if touched
file there don't do it - but that is a little insecure).
After the filesystem is formatted I believe you should be able to list it.
However when I was using cloudera Hadoop you that could return your local
filesy
I would suggest looking into using Vagrant for local testing before pushing
code. Vagrant up.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/zVMH02fI2
As you all may have noticed, Telly (Puppet 3) is in the release
candidate stage and packages have been available in our yum and apt
devel repos. We are committed to offering the latest Puppet packages
from our repos, which means that when Telly goes final, it will be
available in our production rep
Hi All,
Thanks for your feedback. While writing the original email, the subject
sounded familiar and that's because I had written about it in the past:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puppet-users/twLhIwsCRu4/discussion
Apologies to those involved in the other thread for not replying, but
On 9/19/12 4:53 PM, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. While writing the original email, the subject
> sounded familiar and that's because I had written about it in the past:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puppet-users/twLhIwsCRu4/discussion
>
> Apologies to
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Garrett Honeycutt
wrote:
> No need at all to use a different puppet master, you could just use
> environments[1]. When you want to test a system again a different
> environment, staging in this example, you can run `puppet agent -t
> --environment=staging`.
>
Yep,
Hi Paul,
Thanks - good to know. I will double-check our server and client versions today.
JS
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/uDL9bVm9gtAJ.
37 matches
Mail list logo
