On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if I trigger a bug and if so it could also be in ruby
> sqlite3 backend. However, maybe I do something totally wrong.
>
> I have the following part in puppet.conf:
> [master]
> storeconfigs = true
> dblocat
Ok,
thnaks a lot.
Cheers,
Arnau
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For m
On 11/16/2011 12:39 AM, Iain Sutton wrote:
+1 for tangled strings
On 16 November 2011 04:03, Ken Barber mailto:k...@puppetlabs.com>> wrote:
Depends on why you want this info ... but its available in the catalog
on the box for 'grepping' (more or less).
Something I recommend to some
I read the guide at
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/scope_and_puppet.htmland others'
mail, i am a little confused now, below is my understanding:
1. top scope only refers to site.pp, not include node definitions and facts.
2. in puppet class, using variables not local, must specify the namespace
> Alternatively the cheap and hacky approach:
> $foo = inline_template("<%= (processorcount.to_i * 0.8).floor -%>")
That looks direct and sexy to me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Ohad Levy schrieb:
>>> I encountered this bug with many versions on different linux
>>> distributions. For example:
>>> Ubuntu 10.04
>>> Puppet 2.7.6
>>> libsqlite3-ruby1.8 1.2.4-2.1
>>>
>>> Do anybody has an idea what I can do to hand
RADIUS is something I haven't used for a long time (and my last use
was AAA for DSL subscribers, not for Linux), but that is a
possibility. The only issue I'll have there is that I am working with
internal machines that live in a private 'cloud' network @ the office
and a set of private, and custom
On Nov 15, 3:42 pm, Justin Lloyd wrote:
> I tried the following (names changed to protect the innocent and guilty):
>
> class myclass ( $param ) {
>
> $myvar = [ "foo", "bar" ]
>
> if $param == "special" {
> $myvar += [ "blah" ]
> }
>
> }
>
> and got the message "...Cannot ap
Dear community,
I would like to know if it is possible to use different files for the nodes.pp
Can we use in nodes.pp the following syntax :
include nodes2.pp
nodes2.pp could contain host definition eactly as nodes.pp but for a
particular platform.
This would allow more readable configuration
On Nov 16, 3:59 am, flex wrote:
> I read the guide
> athttp://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/scope_and_puppet.htmlandothers'
> mail, i am a little confused now, below is my understanding:
>
> 1. top scope only refers to site.pp, not include node definitions and facts.
Top scope refers to anything
On 11/16/11 3:54 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
On Nov 16, 3:59 am, flex wrote:
I read the guide
athttp://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/scope_and_puppet.htmlandothers'
mail, i am a little confused now, below is my understanding:
1. top scope only refers to site.pp, not include node definitions and fac
On Nov 15, 7:05 am, Stephan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is what I have:
>
> A module that is responsible to roll out and configure TSM (a backup
> tool). Basically I need a text file that mentions all directories that
> have to be backed up. I want to make it a virtual resource and let
> other mod
Hi all,
I'm working thru the tutorial (http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/
manifests.html) using the VM provided (http://www.puppetlabs.com/
downloads/learning/learn_puppet_centos_ovf.2011.07.15.tar.bz). When
asked to write a manifest that ensures httpd is running, I wrote:
service { 'httpd'
Hi All,
I have a define-type resource, which gets called from multiple classes, on
which I would like to read its parameters from a template. This works for
parameters added to the call of the resource but not for those which have a
"default" value on its definition.
On the example below, I can r
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:40:29PM -0800, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working thru the tutorial (http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/
> manifests.html) using the VM provided (http://www.puppetlabs.com/
> downloads/learning/learn_puppet_centos_ovf.2011.07.15.tar.bz). When
> asked to w
Very thanks for your detailed explanation :)
For the last question, what doubt me is only fact variables in a template
which is invoked by a define will throw the warning,
if the template is invoked by a class, everything is ok.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:54 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 1
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:32:41 +0100
Hugo Deprez wrote:
> Dear community,
Hi Hugo,
> I would like to know if it is possible to use different files for the
> nodes.pp
>
> Can we use in nodes.pp the following syntax :
>
> include nodes2.pp
we have several node files but use import.
[...]
> Than
Hello,
I have this setup but don't know how to implement it in puppet. There are 3
servers: puppetmaster, agent1, agent2
In order to setup agent1, I need to run a command on agent2 and return the
data.
I know "file" can generate() function to run a command. However, it runs on
the puppetmaste
Im using puppet 2.7.6 and gem 1.5.2
debug: Puppet::Type::Package::ProviderGem: Executing
'/usr/local/bin/gem list --remote nokogiri$'
debug: /Stage[main]/Hadoop::Gems/Package[nokogiri]/ensure: nokogiri
"1.5.0" is installed, latest is "1.5.0 ruby java x86-mingw32
x86-mswin32-60"
debug: Package[noko
Jo Rhett wrote:
> Are you running the latest centos or redhat-based kernel? If so,
> 274.7.1 is corked. Backgrade from 274.7.1 to 274.3.1 and the problem
> will disappear. This is documented in
>
> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/10418
>
> And RedHat bug
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
- Arnau Bria wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:32:41 +0100
> Hugo Deprez wrote:
>
> > Dear community,
> Hi Hugo,
>
> > I would like to know if it is possible to use different files for the
> > nodes.pp
> >
> > Can we use in nodes.pp the following syntax :
> >
> > include nodes2.pp
>
> we h
When I run `puppet apply --verbose --debug httpd.pp`, the last lines
printed are:
debug: Finishing transaction -608038528
debug: Loaded state in 0.00 seconds
info: Applying configuration version '1321356508'
debug: Service[httpd](provider=redhat): Executing 'ps -ef'
debug: Service[httpd](provider=
Do you have another http daemon running, by chance? If I'm reading this
right, the first run seems to think it found another httpd server on PID
17243 - what's running on that process?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Matthew O'Connor
wrote:
> When I run `puppet apply --verbose --debug httpd.pp
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:03 AM, flex wrote:
> Very thanks for your detailed explanation :)
>
> For the last question, what doubt me is only fact variables in a template
> which is invoked by a define will throw the warning,
> if the template is invoked by a class, everything is ok.
>
Use it as
I think it's fairly common to put something like this in your site.pp
if you like separate node files which I prefer.
import "nodes/*.pp"
You can also use regex in your node files to further simplify though
if you're doing a lot of logic here you should probably start thinking
about an ENC.
fe.p
I looked for that. There's not any other http daemon running. The PID that
the first returns changes every time (now at 23052, 23139, etc.). The
second one never returns a PID (unless there's actually an httpd running).
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Russell Van Tassell
wrote:
> Do you have an
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Matthew O'Connor
wrote:
> I looked for that. There's not any other http daemon running. The PID that
> the first returns changes every time (now at 23052, 23139, etc.). The second
> one never returns a PID (unless there's actually an httpd running).
>
Add hasstatu
That fixed it.
Oh, I think I see what's going on:
When I run `puppet httpd.pp`, it runs `ps` and finds a process with `httpd`
in the name and so concludes the service is running. If I rename the script
to something else then Puppet no longer finds any process with 'httpd' in
its name.
Perhaps Pu
You can setup a "pattern" with a regular expression to weed-out the process
list if you don't use "hasstatus"
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/latest/type.html#service
...but, sounds like you nailed it.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
> That fixed it.
>
> Oh, I
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Karen Loomans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a module to manage /etc/hosts that works fine for RHEL, but not on
> Solaris. Basically I've defined all our hosts as virtual host resources,
> and grouped them various ways by tagging them. These are then realized
> based on
On Nov 16, 9:16 am, Theo Cabrerizo Diem wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a define-type resource, which gets called from multiple classes, on
> which I would like to read its parameters from a template. This works for
> parameters added to the call of the resource but not for those which have a
> "def
Hi Nan,
Thanks for the reply. That was the first thing I asked our group, but
unfortunately for the Solaris servers it is the group's policy not to alias
localhost (for various reasons I won't go into here). I'll raise it again,
but if an alternate solution can be found it would be preferable.
Hi all,
I'm a little bit confused that I did not get a single reply from the list
concerning the problem of not re-created configuration files when using
stored configurations for generating an Icinga/Nagios configuration.
Please tell me at least if my question if this could be a bug seems
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
> That fixed it.
>
> Oh, I think I see what's going on:
>
> When I run `puppet httpd.pp`, it runs `ps` and finds a process with
> `httpd` in the name and so concludes the service is running. If I rename
> the script to something else then
Does the @ method is supported by puppet 2.8? During my test, it can also
be used not only ahead facts variable but also the variable in its parent
class, it is this a wordaround for dynamic scope problem?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:03 A
Hm, I hadn't thought of that.
Do you have a time where one instance of Puppet would manage itself -
versus managing another running copy of Puppet?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Matthew O'Connor <
> thegreendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
the module I'm using is almost setup the same, but I don't experience
the same issue:
the nagios server collects nagios config resources (and sets the target
file for each kind of resource), and there's a resource for the files
themselves which define the permissions.
however, there's no "re
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:09:11PM -0700, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
>Hm, I hadn't thought of that.
>
>Do you have a time where one instance of Puppet would manage itself -
>versus managing another running copy of Puppet?
I do this. A virtual machine template is configured with a puppet.
38 matches
Mail list logo
