On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> * Dashboard now requires Ruby 1.8.7 to operate
I've always found it odd that sysadmins would opt for such an unstable
language. One where minor revisions are often backwards incompatible
changes to the language. The ruby design seems to this particu
ruby 1.8.5, released Apr 2006
ruby 1.8.7, released May 2008
ruby 1.9.2, released Oct 2010
Not exactly bleeding edge though I suppose anything released in the
last four years could be considered that when compared to RHEL 5. :-)
FWIW, if you think of the releases as Ruby 1.0.x, 1.5.x, and 2.0.x
re
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Tim Connors wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Michael Stahnke wrote:
>
>> * Dashboard now requires Ruby 1.8.7 to operate
>
> I've always found it odd that sysadmins would opt for such an unstable
> language. One where minor revisions are often backwards incompatible
>
wat
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Tim Connors wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Michael Stahnke wrote:
>
> > * Dashboard now requires Ruby 1.8.7 to operate
>
> I've always found it odd that sysadmins would opt for such an unstable
> language. One where minor revisions are often backwards incompat
