On Tuesday 19 Oct 2010 21:52:37 Nicolas Szalay wrote:
> - "Al @ Lab42" a écrit :
> | Hi List,
>
> Hi,
>
> | I would like to discuss with whoever is interested one topic that I
> | suppose has general interest.
> |
> | I want to implement some kind of automatic testing on the status of a
> |
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 23:49 -0700, Al @ Lab42 a écrit :
> Generally yes.
IMHO, monitoring needs a "refresh" to cope with the "new way" servers
are operated & built. This is a larger topic that this single thread :)
> > So assuming you have monitoring for all of this, is the problem that you
On Oct 20, 2010, at 2:13 AM, bobics wrote:
> How do I set the Ruby path that Puppet uses? I have Ruby Enterprise
> Edition installed for my *application*, installed from source and
> symlinked (/usr/local/bin/ruby) so it's in the path, overriding the
> default .deb installed standard Ruby (/usr/
Not that I've been able to see, James, though I'd put money on that
I've probably missed something so ridiculously simple that I can't see
it. I've attached the client and Webrick master debug logs - the
Master's Report http error at the end can be ignored, it's because
Apache is shut down on the b
Is it possible to configure puppet to send a "diff" of old/new
files in the tagmail reports when it's changing files ?
Or has someone made a solution for creating such a report
against the clientbucket ?
-jf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppe
* Matt Wallace [2010-10-20]:
> I've not gone down the cucumber-puppet root as I'm not 100% sure how
> it works and how to write stories correctly so if anyone can point me
> at a good resource on this, I'd be very appreciative!
I have put up some documentation at
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/pro
On 10/18/2010 6:14 PM, Hunter Haugen wrote:
so you could do this:
class orden {
stage { [ 'repos', 'os', 'gLite', 'post' ]: }
Stage['repos'] -> Stage['os'] -> Stage['main'] -> Stage['gLite'] ->
Stage['post']
}
A style question: wouldn't it be preferable to write it like this:
class
On 10/19/2010 3:29 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
On Oct 18, 9:03 am, David Schmitt wrote:
Exactly. If done right, this can be achieved by using purging on the
proper directories (like /etc/http/conf.d) to keep away unmanaged
contents. For the most things this obviates the need for a ::no class
altoge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I would suggest taking a look at OpenSCAP and the SCAP initiative led by
NIST.
It is an Open Standard and to me, the concepts act as the validation
side of Puppet enforcement.
http://www.open-scap.org/page/Main_Page
http://scap.nist.gov/revisio
I get the following error:
Database isn't the current migration version: expected 20100726070117,
got 20100916183948 You must either run 'rake db:migrate' or set
environmental variable NO_MIGRATION_CHECK
I upgraded from 1.0.4rc2 and did run 'rake RAILS_ENV=production
db:migrate' before restarting
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:13 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
> I'm guessing you mean you have written sub-*classes* to do that job.
> That is indeed the Puppet way to do it, and I don't find it at all
> ridiculous.
As a puppet newcomer, that is a bit surprising, and IMO unreasonable.
Imagine you are join
On Oct 20, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:13 AM, jcbollinger
> wrote:
>> I'm guessing you mean you have written sub-*classes* to do that job.
>> That is indeed the Puppet way to do it, and I don't find it at all
>> ridiculous.
>
> As a puppet newcomer, tha
Is there a way to view the resource relationship tree for a class (or
all classes)? I'd like an easy way for our admins to see things like
what classes refer to the same resource, which classes require another
class, etc. thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
It seems that the nagios_service type will not write out the "name"
property of nagios service objects. I had thought this was an oversight
or a bug, till I saw this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-b...@googlegroups.com/msg10387.html
which seems to imply that this is a deliberate "fea
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:16:39PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> desired behaviour, why does the nagios_service type have "use" and
> "register" parameters, because they are useless without the ability to
> attach names to services in the generated nagios config.
Well, "use" is still functional
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Patrick wrote:
> I wouldn't call it unreasonable. I would call it "lack of a really cool
> feature".
Pretty fundamental feature :-)
I am not saying Puppet needs to magically know what I'd like to happen
with the file. However, it should at least give us enough
On Oct 19, 6:04 pm, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> [...] I agree with you about the
> importance of state, but in that scenario, to me, not being an LDAP
> client is the basic state.
After much consideration, I think a great deal of this debate hinges
on that definition. It is perfectly reasonable,
On 20.10.2010, at 01:59, James Turnbull wrote:
> We're pleased to announce the availability of Puppet Dashboard 1.0.4!
>
> This is a maintenance release, it fixes a number of bugs, improves the
> user interface, significantly boosts performance and includes better RPM
> and DEB packages. The so
Our puppetmaster runs 0.24.8 on Ubuntu 9.10. Our clients are either
Ubuntu 9.10 or Ubuntu 8.04.
We've just brought up our first Ubuntu 10.04 machine. This machine
installs puppetd 0.25.4.
The Ubuntu 10.04 machine can't seem to present it's certificate request
properly.
In my masterhttp.lo
You can do that by enabling graphs to be generated, in puppet.conf or as an
argument to the client daemon.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM, jb wrote:
> Is there a way to view the resource relationship tree for a class (or
> all classes)? I'd like an easy way for our admins to see things like
>
If the upgrades are not gonna break your network, you'd better upgrade. Also
you'd wanna have the masters upgraded first rather than the clients. But
still you can through the release notes for both the versions and see if you
can work out a solution.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Ed Greenberg
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Pretty fundamental feature :-)
>
You don't have random scripts doing random business. If the puppet modules
have been written nicely, I don't see any reason to be unable to go through
them once, understand the structure, and work from th
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Mohit Chawla
wrote:
>> Except that some definitions may be gone. That's what worries me. Sure
>> I can read the pp files as they are today.
>
> That's probably true for any tool or method. Unless it was in version
> control.
Not true of packages under any modern p
Hi all,
I think many people know this already, but Nigel Kersten has officially joined
us (started today) as product manager. His first job will be figuring out
exactly what that means.
In general, however, Nigel's main job will be making sure that we as a company
are working on the right pri
Hi all,
I'm working on a ext-node script that will use oauth to authenticate
against the node database and I'm wondering if it is possible to read
the puppet.conf file easily in this script so I can place the oauth
key/secret into this file (and basically avoid maintaining my own config
file!)
Is
Andreas,
This error message indicates that the Puppet Dashboard won't start
because your application version is older than your database schema.
Specifically, your Puppet Dashboard code is expecting the schema
shipped with v1.0.3 (schema 20100726070117), but your actual database
schema is the one
Always upgrade the puppetmaster first. Clients will usually not work with a
server that has an older major version.
I've found that using the lucid (10.4) deb files in karmic (9.10) works fine
if You get all the related ones. When ever you upgrade puppet, also upgrade
facter.
On Wed, Oct 20, 20
27 matches
Mail list logo
